I should freely be able to choose how I invest my hard earned monies. Bank interest is ridiculous. There is no reason to have a savings account.
To try to keep up with inflation a trading account is a better option. With all the volatility, I think it is smart to use the inverse and leveraged funds.
If I want to retire from physically working I need other options and at my age buy and hold does
You tax the average person at every turn and on every item you can. You [REDACTED] away billions of dollars while not representing the interests of your constituents. You use our tax dollars to gain favor with U. S. and foreign businesses for your own personal gain. The you I am referring to is our the current worthless politicians that make up our so called Government. Leave our hard earned
It is one thing to protect the retirement assets of individuals from extremely risky or highly speculative investments but complete overreach to attempt to restrict investments in taxable accounts. You would be better focused attempting to level the playing field in our flawed public markets. Why have so many companies gone private? Why is the Fed allowed to so manipulate markets for so long
I am a retired business owner and a 30+ year stock market investor. I am very capable of investing in Leveraged and Inverse Funds. I should not have to have a minimum net worth or go through any special tests before being able to invest in public securities. Please do not regulate or put limitations on Leveraged or Inverse Funds. This will greatly reduce my ability to reach my financial goals to
I vehemently oppose restrictions from Regulators such as FINRA whom I consider bureaucrats to limit my ability to invest in Leveraged ETFs. I have utilized 3X Leveraged ETFs for over a decade with tremendous success that has enabled me to amass millions in capital gains and has allowed me to retire comfortably. I do not want an investment "nanny" to tell me how I want to
I use expert advice to manage my personal investments for retirement. As a fixed income retiree, I require my continued ability and ease of access to easily invest in leveraged shares that run inverse to the market as buffer to a falling market. Time is not on my side as a older investor, I am opposed to any newly conceived restrictions to this access to funds like ProShares S&P 500
I am strongly opposed to limiting the ability of investors to buy leveraged index funds. I and my children have found long term investment in TQQQ and UPRO to have increased our retirement savings and college tuition savings considerably, thereby eliminating our need to go into debt.
Limiting these opportunities to only high net worth investors only furthers wealth inequality - helping the rich
My family would not have been able to purchase our current home without having make the incredibly shrewd and well-researched decision to invest in a leveraged ETF, when we began doing over ten years ago. Limiting our ability to invest in leveraged and inverse ETFs will completely undermine both our retirement and mid-term growth strategies which we have been successfully relying upon on for
I oppose the restrictions on being able to buy public investments. I dont think I should have to take any type of test to see if I qualify to purchase any type of investment. I buy different types of investments including cryptos to diversify my investments. I have done quite well in the past with the stock market and plan on living off the investment returns through out my(our) retirement years
As a retired RIA (registered investment advisor) I have witnessed the effects of accredited investor rules first hand. From my experience with my clients those types of requirements do nothing to protect the investor, or ensure they understand the investments they are making. I have seen high net worth, high income individuals make horrible investment decisions. And I have seen individuals who
