SummaryFINRA is issuing this Notice to provide guidance for members affected by the recent failures of Silicon Valley Bank (SVB) and Signature Bank (Signature).Questions concerning this Notice should be directed to your firm’s Risk Monitoring Analyst.BackgroundThe following is guidance for member firms affected by the recent failures of SVB and Signature.For Members with Deposits at SVB and
I strongly oppose restrictions on my right to invest! I am able to choose public investments that are right for me and my family! I see no reason for you to restrict my use of them as I understand their risks! I don't need nor do I want your ways imposed upon me regarding leveraged and inverse funds which are important to my investment strategies. They are desirable even as a limited part of
I should be able to choose the public investments that are right for me and my family. Public investments should be available to all of the public, not just the privileged. You shouldn't have to go through any special process like passing a test before you can invest in public securities, like leveraged and inverse funds. I am perfectly capable of understanding the risks and determining
Hello, I vehemently object to the proposed rule. I should have the full right to choose public investments that are right for me and my family. Public investments should be available to all of the public, not just the privileged. I object to any requirement that requires going through any special process before investing in complex products. Leverage and inverse funds are important tools for my
I'm outraged that the government regulators think they need to limit my access to leveraged and inverse funds. These are public investments and should be available to all investors. Allowing only wealthy investors to use them to invest and hedge portfolios is unfair and gives wealthy people more advantages over small investors. My broker already makes sure I know the risks so additional
Individual Investors have the ability to make sound decisions right for us for personally & family. Leveraged and Inverse funds just like the name states, is easily understood and expressive. NO MORE requirements should be placed. An investment strategy should have risk mitigation (Inverse fund) and opportunity to gain (Leverage) Law makers should fix Loop holes for Hedge funds, and
I should be able to choose the public investments that are right for me and my family. Public investments should be available to all of the public, not just the privileged. If you want retail investors to continue investing through the rough markets, we need access to public securities like leveraged and inverse funds, which allow us to make bets against the market without the risks that come
I oppose restrictions to my right to invest. I-not regulators- should be able to choose the public investments that are right for me and my family. Public investments should be available to all of the public, not just the privileged. I have made 200% in one stock and over 100% in three stocks. My banking stock is rising. I am capable of understanding leveraged and inverse and their risks. I do
This is unwarranted, unjustified, and unnecessary. Investors should be able to make their own decisions about what they invest in, and when, and how. Fund family vendors provide all the information necessary about their product(s) to let any investor who TAKES RESPONSIBILITY for THEMSELVES for their actions to understand clearly what they are investing in, and the risks inherent in that
Having traded futures, metals, South African gold mining stocks, and a long-time investor in coins and bullion. I know of the risks of buying leveraged and inverse funds. Please do not limit or complicate my ability to make these purchases as I wish. Right now i am short the stock market with DOG and short intrest rates with TBF; Also long with oil holding USO. My money - my decisions!!!
