I don't believe FINRA should restrict 'complex' products from average or retail investors. All trading has risks and where does FINRA stop in regards to restricting retail traders, this is a very slippery slope. Sure it makes sense to have brokers post messages on some products, but this feels like a ploy to hurt retail investors not protect them. This should not be
I have more than 40 years experiments and knowledge in the stock market investment. I am not a regulator and have the right to choose any public investment. Leveraged and inverse funds are my important investment strategies. I do understand their volatility and risks. I did not always invest the leveraged and inverse funds and I also invest some defensive ETF. I appreciate your no restriction on
I, not regulators should be able to choose the public investments that are right for me and my family. Public investments should be available to all of the public, not just the privileged. I shouldn't have to go through any special process like passing a test before you can invest in public securities, cryptocurrency funds such as BITO.I am capable of understanding cryptocurrency funds such
I think very strongly that investors such as myself should be able to freely chose which public investments are right for me at various points in my life. I believe that I understand the risks some investments carry and that they are my responsibility. I am a regular investor of leveraged and inverse funds and view them as tools for wealth creation. Purchasing them should not be regulated or
The rights of investors must be protected. It is the responsibility of the investor to educate himself as to what is a proper trading vehicle for the investor personally vis a vis financially. The brokerage firm in which I trade has transparency and risk disclosure for such short-term active trading. Direxion Leveraged and Inverse ETF Education Center is very good tool to guide the investor to
I am a financially literate investor that uses leveraged ETFs as part of a diversified portfolio. Sweeping restrictions of financial instruments create unnecessary barriers of entry for investors seeking to increase market exposure. I believe regulation similar to options is acceptable as leveraged funds are inherently riskier than non-leveraged. However, a properly educated investor who
I shouldn't have to go through any special process like passing a test before I am able to invest in public securities, like leveraged and inverse funds. I have been capable of understanding leveraged and inverse funds and their risks. Perhaps you want to impose these on new investors, however, I do not need these measures imposed on me and it would take away a ton of tax revenue if this
I should be able to choose the public investments that are right for you and your family. Public investments should be available to all of the public, not just the privileged. I shouldn't have to go through any process like passing a test before investing in public securities like leveraged and inverse funds. I am capable of understanding leveraged and inverse funds and their risks.
I shouldn't have to go through any special process
like passing a test before I can invest in public securities,
like leveraged and inverse funds. I am capable of understanding leveraged and inverse funds and their risks. I do not need these measures imposed on you. You do not need to protect me from myself. Go do something useful and so not waste tax dollars chasing wild dreams
I shouldn't have to go through any special process
like passing a test before I can invest in public securities,
like leveraged and inverse funds. I am capable of understanding leveraged and inverse funds and their risks. I do not need these measures imposed on you. You do not need to protect me from myself. Go do something useful and so not waste tax dollars chasing wild dreams
