The people of The United States have the right to make their own decisions regarding investments. I use technical analysis as guidance to invest for my families future. You have no right to change the rules when we the people can profit in a recession.
Sincerely, Donald Ray Scott Jr. (c)
Investors should be allowed to invest as they see fit without regulatory intervention. I use derivatives as a way to hedge my investments and do not want to be restricted. There are already rules in place to protect inexperienced investors and we do not need more regulations. I am opposed to any additional regulations.
[REDACTED] socialist elites want to strip Main Street investors from opportunities they will reserve for themselves like insider trading. Who could be more of an insider trader than Nancy Pelosi and the rest of Congress they only want two classes in America the ruling elite and the rest of us
If you are going to change rules -- do it at a point where the commodity is at a neutral point -- say nat gas at $3.00 that way you do not hurt investors who need the inverse to recover a position affected by a parabolic run up -- do it -- but not at a point that seriously hurts some investors
Comments:
This is to inform you that there is no need of enhancements to current rules for Brokerage firms. There is already a warning at Brokerage firms and that is sufficient. We know they are short term and monitor them daily. No change is needed. This is in regards to Leveraged and Inverse ETF's. Please do NOT limit access. I depend upon them!
To impose Rule #22-08 would be completely un-American. Investors, other than holding government positions, should be able to invest in any stock, from penny stock to unlimited. This is another unfair, power grab law. Setting the powerful Uber rich above everyone else. This is wrong.
I use my leveraged funds to hedge various positions. they are useful for reducing the amount of funds necessary for taking a position.
I feel your rules may limit my access to these useful tools.
My brokerage houses provide extensive information and they outline the risks and of these products.
Robert Pallaron
As I understand this move by the Biden Administration You want to limit our freedoms. That would be the another step to removing all Americas freedoms and dividing our nation into the have and the have nots. FINRA Proposed Rule #22-08 is not a good move for America and you know it and so do we.
First I would like you to read this thread: https://www.reddit.com/r/Superstonk/comments/o1sggl/the_hidden_shorts_the_correlation_of_ftds_and/ I believe that institutions are hiding the true number of short positions on certain stocks, that they are doing this using rehypothication, dark pools, and shady (fraudulent?) use of puts and calls. I ask that FINRA consider the following changes: 1.
The additional transparency and short interest reporting rules that FINRA is proposing are a welcome start. All short interest reporting should be made available to the public for 2 reasons. First, this information directly impacts all investors. Second, it is clear that there is no way possible for FINRA, SEC or any other regulator to police the markets. By making all reported short interest
