Id like to offer that further restrictions or changes to what qualifies an investor to use leveraged and or inverse products are not needed and can cause damage to the portfolio of investors beyond the governments tools that already cause damage, add unneeded complexity and detriment to retail investors. It is disengenuine and presumptive to allow the fed and various lending facilities to manage
A plan like this will cost me tens of thousands of dollars as it will tank my current investment.
I have a BA in economics and I'm an accredited investor.
With leveraged products unskilled and uneducated investors are disposed of quickly by the market.
i oppose restrictions to my right to invest
The risks of investing are inherent in any fund or security. That is something made known when beginning to invest and heavily emphasized in literature to those considering investing. It's my responsibility as a investor to vet and understand the products I'm investing in. As part of that vetting process, I use leverage to manage my downside risk. It also constitutes a very
You want to prevent me from trading products that are too "complex" for me unless I pass a regulator-imposed test? This seems a lot like when blacks were prevented from voting unless they passed a regulator-imposed "literacy test". My response is simple: this is despicable. You should be ashamed of yourselves. Really.
"Complex" products are
Aloha, as a small retail investor I would definitely NOT be in favor of any of any restrictions on my ability to buy and sell publicly-traded ETF's and similar common financial products, so long as the already well-known risks are plainly and honestly disclosed by issuers and brokers in any promotional materials. Trying to accurately determine who is and isn't capable of
Please do not interfere in my ability to chose what I invest in. If you want to stress or emphasize investor education on the various risks of different products then so be it but to try and interfere or prohibit everyone except the wealthiest individuals from investing in them is completely wrong and unacceptable. Leveraged and inverse funds are important to different peoples investment
I should be able to choose the public investments that are right for me and my family. Public investments should be available to all of the public, not just the privileged.
Leveraged and inverse funds are important to my
investment strategies. I use leverage and inverse funds to
protect (hedge) my investments or seek enhanced
returns, and for a limited part of my overall portfolio.
Me not regulators should be able to choose the public
investments that are right for you and your family.
Public investments should be available to all of the public,
not just the privileged.
I shouldn't have to go through any special process
like passing a test before you can invest in public securities,
like leveraged and inverse funds
There absolutely no to suppress the freedoms of investment whether it for or against the market. If institutions are allowed to and not be held accountable for nearly breaking Americans back then it is only fair to bet against their actions.
