I have been trading leveraged ETFs for years. I understand the risks associated with them, as well as, all investment vehicles; leveraged or otherwise. Government imposed restrictions of these funds is not needed nor wanted. I should not have to go through any special process just to prove that I can use these products as a part of my investment strategy. Asking someone to prove they have enough
Hello, I don't want you to limit my investment options. I have been investing for 35 years and I know the risks I am taking. I am concerned you are making these changes to limit my ability to invest in things that could go up substantially. The government is printing money like crazy and the markets could get pretty wild. You need to let individual investors protect themselves.
Dear FINRA Regulators,
I should be able to choose the public investments that are right for me and my family. Public investments should be available to all of the public, not just the privileged.
I shouldn't have to go through any special process like passing a test before I can invest in public securities, like leveraged and inverse funds. I am capable of understanding leveraged and
Greetings, Every year my brokerage house, Charles Schwab, sends a yearly form I must sign and return in which I have to acknowledge the risks of geared investment products. Otherwise my ability to buy those products is suspended. Please leave it at that. Managing my portfolio is enough work without complicating it with needless and unwarranted oversight. I have been using geared products for
As an stock market investor for many years, I have invested in a broad range of products including leveraged and inverse funds. I am well aware of the additional risks when added to my stock portfolio. Having the continued right to choose these products maintains my freedom to invest in public securities. Today, I use ETFs as a hedge in these volatile markets. I hedge to enhance my returns
I have been investing in leveraged ETFs and leveraged mutual funds for more than 20 years. These securities have been a valuable component of my investment strategy, and I don't think the FINRA should be limiting their use in order to "protect" investors like myself who are knowledgeable about their risks and rewards. I do not want any regulators to limiting my
I am 74 years old and have the majority of my assets under mgt. with two different styled advisors. I have invested in Pro Shares Short S & P 500 ETF for two small accounts (which I oversee) in a very limited and disciplined approach to offset the economic problems caused by the current administration in Washington. I understand the risk, but given the current market conditions,
I should be able to choose the public investments that are right for me and my family, including the leveraged and inverse funds. Public investments should be available to all of the public, not just the privileged.
I shouldn't have to go through any special process like passing a test before I can invest in public securities like leveraged and inverse funds. I am capable of
I want to relay my concerns about the referenced regulatory notice.
I do not believe any incremental regulatory requirements should be placed on leveraged investment instruments. I disagree with the notion of testing, thresholds, net worth requirements and so on. These are public instruments that should be made available to all. Firms selling these products are quite clear communicating the
To Whom It May Concern,
Me not regulators should be able to choose the public
investments that are right for me and my family.
Public investments should be available to all of the public,
not just the privileged.
I shouldn't have to go through any special process
like passing a test before I can invest in public securities,
like leveraged and inverse funds.
I am
