Who decides what is "complex"? Isn't that a subjective process? What if a regulatory regime likes annuities because they take the investment options and risk away from the citizen, and declares every other investment vehicle "complex"? Regulators should regulate the processes under which investments are offered and sold to the public, not the investment options available
To whom it may concern. I am writing in regards to the proposed restrictions on certain investment vehicles. My position is let the free markets decide which type of investment are marketable and of interest to the investment community. Politicians are not in a good position to make these decisions. There are already many safeguards in place to ensure educated investors are appropriately
I completely OPPOSE RESTRICTIONS TO MY RIGHT TO INVEST in leveraged or inverse products. Public investment should be available to public, not just the privileged. Im capable of understanding and trading inverse and leveraged products..dont need special restrictions on public products not fair. They are very important part of my portfolio in protecting or hedging against market uncertainty or
Please do not take away my right to invest in leveraged etfs. I understand the risk involved. I can buy apple stock or leveraged etfs and potentially lose every dollar I invest. One can only lose the amount of money they invest in leveraged etfs unlike options where your loss can be infinite. Why is this being targeted? I question the intentions behind this. Please do not overstep your reach!
While I am not a financial professional, I have been managing my own investments for over 40 years. Studying the financial markets and the available instruments is something that I do on a regular basis. I fully understand the risks of leveraged and inverse funds and have successfully used these funds to help me meet my financial goals as part of diversified investment portfolio. I do not feel
I shouldn't have to go through any special process like passing your arbitrary test before I can invest in public securities, like leveraged and inverse funds. I have been investing and trading in the stock market since 1957 and understand leveraged and inverse funds and their risks. I do not want, and do not need to have your unnecessary measures imposed on me or anybody else. Please
Dear FINRA Regulators, In regards to Regulatory Notice #22-08, as an individual investor, who has used leveraged and inverse ETFs extensively, I oppose proposed restrictions to my ability to invest in these products as I see fit. I left Vanguard because of their decision to eliminate the ability of investors to use these products. As an adult who is capable of understanding the risks involved
Dear FINRA regulators,
I'm writing to oppose Notice #22-08. Investors knows best for their investment objectives and therefore they shall choose the public investments that are right for themselves and their families. I as all individual investors am capable of understanding leveraged and inverse funds and their risks, and we do not need any measurements to impose on us. Public
Hello,
Please do not take away my ability to continue holding TQQQ as an investment. I have allocated a portion of my portfolio to holding TQQQ long-term. I am OK with a short test requirement to make sure people know what they're doing with leveraged ETFs like TQQQ. People shouldn't take on risks they don't understand. But please do not take away my ability to
I am opposed to further regulations to restrict or disqualify me from trading L&I Funds. I am aware of the high risk and short term volatility to valuations of these funds and the need for daily if not hourly monitoring and evaluation.
My brokerage firm, Fidelity, already provides a popup warning statement for me on these funds and it has been effective in causing second thoughts and
