I should be able to invest in the public investments that are available. There should be not any special process like passing a test before I can invest in public securities.
I use leveraged and inverse funds to hedge my portfolio in volatile market. It is very important to me to have the leveraged and inverse funds available to investors like me. I do not want to sell all the stocks in my
I feel strongly that FINRA's proposed rule (#22-08) is incorrectly applies 'investor protection' as FINRA's stated purpose is, specifically with regard to leveraged and inverse products. As a user of such products, were these rules implemented, I would be forced to potentially re-create the same sort of exposure on my own which is a far greater risk to my own
I not regulators should be able to choose the public
investments that are right for you and your family.
Public investments should be available to all of the public,
not just the privileged.
It is very important that you express your views in your own
wordsyour comments are more likely to be taken seriously
by FINRA if they reflect your own experience and perspective.
Not only do you
Again, regulators who do not know me AT ALL want to make serious, critical decisions about my financial needs/wants. WHY??? Please, let me decide what investments are right for me and make sure, continue to keep ALL public leveraged and inverse funds/investments available for everyone. Isn't is a good thing I want to be a secure, self-supporting, productive citizen of society? It benefits me
I should be able to choose what I invest in. Why is gambling legal but I can't invest in what I deem appropriate? Gambling always has a house advantage and I cannot come out ahead in the long run but with investments I know exactly what I'm getting into and the risks involved. I should be able to store my money with NEXO or Celcius without having regulations shoved onto me. I should be
Gentlemen, I am a fully accredited investor who selects from wide body of publicly available investments, including currencies, commodities, equities, and fixed income, both long and inverse, predominantly through ETF's. I fully understand the risks inherent in investing, especially the ramifications of investing in inverse funds, which reset daily. I use inverse ETF's to hedge and
I Oppose Restrictions To My Right to Invest in Complex Products, including Leveraged and Inverse funds! Any attempt to impose restrictions on the individuals right to buy these trading instruments gives the large trading firms an unfair advantage and makes the market unfair to us. Large firms have resources to use trading programs and other trading tools which individual investors do not have.
Taking away investor rights to risk management assets like leveraged and inverse funds is robbing investors of income and simple tools which can only be emulated with complex options transactions if at all. Such regulation Hurts Investors: It could potentially deny us the freedom to choose investments that could help us achieve long-term financial security. Is Arbitrary and Unworkable: FINRAs
FINRA, Most people, including myself, who have managed to save any money are fully capable of researching leveraged funds and deciding if investing in them suits our needs and risk levels. We should not have to go through any kind of special process or pass any kind of a test. These funds are mostly used to hedge against unexpected shocks to the market and must be entered into, or exited, in a
To Whom it May Concern, I was troubled to learn that the FINRA is considering passing SEC Proposed Rule #S7-24-15, which would affect individual investors like myself from using several popular public investments, including leveraged and inverse funds. I believe that I, not regulators, should be able to choose the public investments that are right myself and my family. Public investments should
