Dear Sir/Madam:
Leveraged and inverse funds are a vital part of helping me to hedge my portfolio and avoiding constant trading. I use these tools to short the S&P 500 or other indexes when they have become frothy (in my view). These products reduce the volatility and allow me to stay in core positions longer. I use them as short-term hedges and the risks of staying in them too long
I should be able to choose the public investments that are right for you and your family. Public investments should be available to all of the public, not just the privileged.
I shouldn't have to go through any special process like passing a test before I can invest in public securities,
like leveraged and inverse funds. I am capable and am sure many others are as well, of understanding
I would suggest that if you are considering stiffer regulations on leveraged investments, you should take a look in other places where there is nothing but hot air underneath. Netflix, Rivian and hundreds more highly inflated stocks. The problem with that is given your belief that more government is better government would drive you there without that suggestion. These investments give the little
I am writing in response to the proposal to regulate the use of inverse ETFs and leveraged funds. I strongly oppose the federal government regulating which public investments I can and cannot invest in for myself and my family, as well as any additional regulatory processes required to make an investment of my choosing. There are already plenty of disclosures that address the potential risks and
I oppose the purchase restrictions. Trading of these types of leveraged funds should be available to all. As an alternative to the restrictions, a requirement could be to allow purchasing after receiving one training course on the risks of these funds. Under no circumstances should trading of these types of funds be limited to only those with a high net worth. An alternative could be a limit on
As an individual investor, I take full responsibility for my investment choices. Public investment tools should be available to all, not just the privileged. Leveraged and inverse funds, options, etc. are important financial tools in the portfolio. I sometimes use them for risk management. I am strongly against the proposal to limit the trading of such financial tools. I do not want to have to go
I oppose restrictions to my right to invest. I should be able to choose the public investments that are right for me. I shouldnt have to go through any special process like passing a test before I can invest in public securities, like inverse or leveraged funds. I am capable of understanding leveraged and inverse funds and their risk. Leveraged and inverse funds are important to my strategies
I believe individuals should be free to invest their money freely, without undo regulation. I'm fine with my brokerage having me acknowledge that I understand I'm taking on some additional risk with leveraged and inverse funds. Beyond that, I should be free to invest in these publicly traded funds. For me, this is keeping me away from Options trading and associated
I strongly oppose restrictions on my right to invest in public investments.
I am thoroughly capable of understanding leveraged and inverse funds and their risks. I've been in the market for more than 15 years and have accrued a winning portfolio. Leveraged and inverse funds are EXTREMELY important to my investment strategies. I need to be able to choose the public investments that
Leveraged products used in an appropriate way within a investing framework have been a boon to investors like me.
The option to choose investments should not be available just to the privileged "accredited investors". I fully understand the risks associated with these products and choose to invest in them. These products/ funds are an important albeit small part of my portfolio
