Dear Sirs: I object to your attempts to stifle the free trade in the stock market. Inhibiting my ability to buy inverse stocks without demonstrating compliance with rules meant to restrict this freedom is anti-American. Leveraged and inverse funds are a key part of my investment strategy. Let free trade continue and stop any attempt to restrict our freedom to invest as we see fit.
As someone who has invested in the markets my whole life this proposed rule is just wrong. The only reason to do such a thing is to not let small individual investors control the money they have. It is the individuals right to invest as they wish and deal with whatever gains or loses they end up with by the decisions they make. It is American as it gets, the pursuit of life liberty and happiness
I would like you people to explain to me why you think you and biden should have sole access too the high yield investments and leave us working people the low yield paper? Do you really believe exclusion can be legislated for your benefit only (the rich)? Take your Rule #22-08 and stick it as Johnny Paycheck use to say!
Investors should be allowed to invest how and when they would like. We all know there are risks in any investment, and as long as there are rules that are enforced to make it an even playground, the SEC should not be the "parent" telling adults how to invest their funds.
Maybe not allow Politicians who have insider knowledge invest in stocks that they can manipulate with notices
It is with utmost concern that I am reading this proposed rule change to limit retail investors like myself from trading leveraged ETF's. Trading these has been an incredible tool to enhance my portfolio. To "protect retail investors from the potential risk associated with ETF's" is just a cynical attempt by the FINRA industry to force retail investors back under their control
This is not right sounds like more of what happened at GameStop. Everyday in the market we find reasons that the US Stock Exchange is not a free market system. We need to go back to when the people made the exchange and the United States the most free nation in the world. But it was by the means being discussed today. The people will not stand for anymore rule bending that only prospers those
All Stocks, ETF's, Funds or other investments are all subject to investment risk regardless of there class or structure. The choice is mine when making investment choices and must not be subject to Regulator involvement. The rules now on investment trading are already restrictive to a large degree.
Where were the Regulators when my pension was frozen during Company bankruptcy. Please
This proposed rule is an infringement on investors' freedom to invest in whatever they want to. Investors (not regulators) should be able to choose investments that meet our needs. The FINRA better not move forward with this regulation as investors are not in favor of this. No investor should have to go through special classes or processes to invest. Investors have the ability to
SUGGESTED ROUTING
Senior Management
Executive Representatives
Legal & Compliance
Registered Representatives
Systems
Trading
Executive Summary
On September 14, 1998, the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) approved rule amendments that are designed to integrate transaction information reported to the Automated Confirmation Transaction ServiceSM (ACTSM)
End dark pool abuse. Clearly their is active manipulation of GameStop and AMC. Set better standards. Enforce rules. Create fines that are meaningful as compared to a “cost of doing business.” Enforce loss of licenses or fines that are above and beyond the actual revenue made from illegal and manipulated trades.
