I do not appreciate regulators restricting my choices of what I can invest in by making arbitrary rules.
As an individual, I learned that prior to investing in securities, I had to invest in my own financial education first, including risks associated with leveraged and inverse funds. Instead of making it more cumbersome to invest, consider helping and making it easier so younger generations may
I find it troubling that regulatory agencies would limit my ability to use cryptocurrency for the advancement of my personal financial future. It would be a miscarriage of justice to limit individual liberty by not allowing or limiting my ability to invest in Cryptocurrency. Also why not focus on hedge funds and big banks commiting fraud by shorting different crypto assets to profit themselves
Freedom and self-determination are essential to a better life for me and my family. I have spent much time and dollars to equip myself for trading options and futures to which I have been able to better my returns and hedge my accounts from future declines. Therefore, I say that I should have the freedom to engage with these instruments without interference to achieve my financial objectives.
It is not the government's role to determine an individual's ability to understand their own finances. Therefore I oppose this notice quite directly. Information about "complex" and inverse financial products is freely available online, and any able minded adult is able to find this information easily. Just because an individual may not fully understand a
Many, many people buy and sell many forms of stocks. For both monthly income, and long term investments.
Further regulating how we can invest will add a financial strain to an already unstable economy. Not to mention raise the number of unemployed.
Government agencies should not have any authority over how we invest our money. Especially with a poor track record of properly managing anything.
Another invasion of Americans personal freedom. Leveraged and inverse funds are publicly traded and have been approved
for the public to trade. I understand the risks and have an understanding of these entities. There is no need to impose any kind of regulations or added requirements to any tools I use in my investment strategies.
How about the Financial Industry Regulatory Authority employees
I have a strong understanding of Leveraged and Inverse ETFs: Three keys to ongoing successful use: Short term trades only Position appropriately sized. Continuous monitoring of position. My contention is we do not need additional government regulation / guidance as it relates to these products. I do not have any financial interest other than being able to use these products as I consider
Dear Mr./Mrs.,
It would be a grave mistake to limit leveraged funds to only a select few. Such practice would simply push individuals to trade on margin in a more risky/less controlled manner. By only allowing leveraged funds for professional traders or wealthy individuals you take financial tools out of the hands of the common person. This will make it even more difficult to provide
The rights of investors must be protected. It is the responsibility of the investor to educate himself as to what is a proper trading vehicle for the investor personally vis a vis financially. The brokerage firm in which I trade has transparency and risk disclosure for such short-term active trading. Direxion Leveraged and Inverse ETF Education Center is very good tool to guide the investor to
I have 10 years of experience as a Financial Advisor and 5 years as a CFP. I have the knowledge and experience to select my own investments and I dont want to be directed by a regulator who doesnt know me. Leverage and inverse funds are very important to me to hedge other investments from adverse market moves. Leave it up to the individual broker and the investment firm to help the client what
