To whom it may concern - I am violently opposed to any rule restricting access to investment products for the public. This is just another mechanism to make the rich richer, and steal money from the masses who are trying to build wealth through sophisticated avenues. Your hubris in attempting to control the public's investment options by claiming that it is "in our best interest"
I should be allowed to invest freely into projects that I see financially beneficial and not be locked out of the real gains because of some ridiculous rule that states I'm not eligible because I don't have enough money. That reasoning was forced into law to keep people from bettering their selves and goes against everything America was supposedly founded on. I will echo this
I am very concerned about recent intentions to limit the publics ability to invest in leveraged and/or inverse funds. No one knows better what investments are right for me than me. I should not be required to prove myself to anyone before being allowed to invest my hard earned money where I see fit. The whole idea of the nanny state where the government needs to take care of me is extremely
Individual investors have been excluded from the advantages of large trading firms and lawmakers. Taking away individual investor RIGHTS to invest in leveraged & Inverse funds is just another ball & chain on individuals in their strides towards financial independence from Government. If an individual had invested in a triple leveraged S&P index fund for the last 10 years,
I OPPOSE RESTRICTIONS TO MY RIGHT TO INVEST!
I should be able to choose the public investments that are right for my family and I. Public investments should be available to all of the public, not just the privileged.
I should not have to go through a special process like passing an SAT before I can invest in public securities. My wife and I both hold advanced degrees and have been in business
I oppose restrictions to investing in leveraged ETF's for individual investors. WE all get the information regarding risks to investing in these funds and as such should be permitted to buy, sell and hold these as we see fit based on our personal financial goals and needs. It is not democratically fair to restrict these funds to large investment firms, which would force individual
Ladies and Gentlemen: By limiting access to any investment opportunities you block any of us who are trying to improve our lives from investing you lock us from being able to improve. There is already in place on some things restrictions defined as an accredited investor. If you block us from being able to invest you doom us to classes of rich and poor and the middle class merging in with the
I oppose the regulations being considered by the Financial Industry Regulatory Authority. I have the right to choose which public investments I want to invest in. This should not be taken away to benefit only those with high net worth or a privileged few. I do not believe any process needs to be implemented in order to invest in leveraged and inverse funds. I already use them as important
I am a Chartered Financial Analyst (CFA) holder with more than ten years of investment experience. I'm capable to manage the investment risk in my own portfolio. I do not need the regulators to choose the investments that is right for me. I have my own investment strategies that matches my risk tolerance. Leveraged funds are important to my strategies. They help me hedge my
I don't think it's the government's business telling me what investments I can or cannot make or placing impediments in my path to make it more difficult or impossible. As long as the investment issues are above-board, public vehicles, and not fraudulent, scams, or money-laundering fronts, FINRA should butt out. If they are worried that we are endangering our
