Greetings,
I am writing to inform you that I oppose any restriction on leveraged investing aside from warnings that they are not to be held long term. I believe that they are an invaluable tool that everyone should have access to, but not everyone should use. I am well informed and have determined that, considering my unique, highly risk-tolerant financial position, that these tools have great
I should be able to choose the public investments that are right for you and your family. Public investments should be available to all of the public, not just the privileged.
I should not need to go through any special process
before I can invest in public securities, like leveraged and inverse funds. I am capable of understanding leveraged and inverse funds and their risks.
Leveraged and
I not regulators should be able to choose the public investments that are right for me and my family. Public investments should be available to all of the public, not just the privileged. Leveraged and inverse funds are important to my investment strategies to cope up with market direction and events with measured risk that i take and control and not left to luck or hope in investing. I shouldn
Regulators,
Regarding FINRA Proposed Rule #22-08, I - not regulators should be able to choose the public investments that are right for me and my family.
Public investments should be available to ALL of the public, not just the privileged or those you deem qualified. Less regulation, happier investors.
I shouldn't have to go through any special process like passing a test before I
If the market is in fact a free market then this rule proposal would never have been proposed. A free market isn't just for the rich who can afford it. The choice to participate in the market is an individual choice that each person must make for themselves, that should not include taking a test before investing in public securities. Furthermore this will create further speculation that
Limiting public investment avenues is both discriminatory and oppressive. American citizens and their families should have direct access to investment protocols by their own decision without discriminatory blocks to access. We do know the value and risk involved with investments such as BITO and other exchange traded commodities, cryptocurrencies and funds and the value that they have in a
I am against any more restrictions to my ability to trade leveraged securities. I have been fully informed of the risks involved by my broker Fidelity in these products and had to sign and submit a document stating so to Fidelity. I am fully capable of making informed decisions on my own without any further government or regulatory restrictions such as passing a written test or proving my net
Your Proposed Rule #S7--24-15 is a flagrant and unwarranted intrusion on the rights of individuals to invest as they chose. Who gives you the right to decide what instruments people can invest in? Peoples' freedom to invest as they chose should not be compromised by a self-appointed body of regulators who are overstepping their boundaries. As long as one educates his/herself on what they
To Regulators, I shouldn't have to go through any special process like passing a test before I can invest in public securities, like leveraged and inverse funds because I have more than 40 years of stock and options trading experience in USA. I am capable of understanding those funds and their risks more than any finance professionals. It is totally against the spirit of law under democratic
I trade leveraged and inverse funds in order to feed my family and pay my mortgage. I am 60 years old and do not have skills to get a job that would pay enough. My husband is 82 and a fall risk. We cannot afford assisted living. So being able to trade allows me to take care of him. I honestly don't know anyone who has gone broke from trading. My experience is that your proposed regulations
