I disagree with restricting my free and equitable access to leveraged and inverse funds.
Trying to limit the access of investors to leveraged and inverse funds will further put the individual investor at disadvantage against big institutions.
These funds have been there for years and are part of many investor's strategies (e.g. hedging risk).
Another point to consider is that restricting
I have learned that you are considering limiting investors ability to buy leveraged and inverse funds. I have had terrific successes with these types of funds and in fact the bulk of my trades are using this as part of my investment strategy.
Please reconsider, and leave these securities as-is so that we can buy and sell as we should be allowed to do in a free market economy. All the risks
I, as an investor, should have the right to choose the public investments. Public investments should be available to all of the public. I should not have to go through any special process like passing a test before I can invest in public securities, like leveraged and inverse funds. I have already understood leveraged and inverse funds and their risks. I do not need these measures imposed on me.
To whom it may concern,
I should be able to choose the public investments that are right for me and my family.
Public investments should be available to all of the public,
not just the privileged.
These investment vehicles have become integral to my investment strategy. They are wonderful tools to help me protect my investments.
I am more that capable to understand the way leveraged ETFs function
To Whom It May Concern,
Leveraged funds provide the opportunity for growth with limited downside for investors. While more volatile, the risk/return ratio for a triple leveraged S&P fund would be close to the same as a regular index fund. There is risk in any investment. With leveraged etfs, your investment is more diversified than investing in individual securities. Please keep the
In a free country I should be free to invest my money the way I see fit, not the way the government wants me to invest. I have done very well in leveraged and inverse funds. Markets go down as well as up and you can beat the market without the risk of individual stocks by using leveraged funds. The government has already taken far too many of our rights away in an effort to cater to powerful
I am writing to comment on the proposed changes to leverage and inverse funds. Please be advised that, myself along with many of my friends, family, and colleagues have invested through these vehicles for the last decade that they have been available. Everyone I know reads the prospectus, understands the strategies used to achieve the result, and are familiar with and accept the risks associated
I am a simplistic retail investor. I only invest in index funds and ETFS which track an index. I think much of the literature promotes this type of investing, but I believe if you are willing to invest in "complex" products then you should be allowed to. Though I not think this notice is recommending to restrict index funds; I am doubtful that once we begin restricting financial
I should be able to choose the public investments that are right for me and my family. Public investments should be available to all of the public, not just privileged.
I should not have to go through any special process like passing a test before I can invest in public securities, like leveraged and inverse funds. I am capable of understanding leveraged and inverse funds and their risks.
I, not regulators, should be able to choose the public investments that are right for me and my family. Public investments should be available to all of the public, not just privileged.
I should not have to go through any special process like passing a test before I can invest in public securities, like leveraged and inverse funds. I am capable of understanding leveraged and inverse funds and
