Comments: I am strongly against limited access to leveraged and inverse ETF's. They are not in any way conceptually confusing and they are always accompanied by significant disclaimers describing their short term nature and the extra volatility expected. Limiting access to these products would decrease my ability to effectively manage the risk in my portfolio, especially on the short side.
I oppose any action that limits the right of any America citizen to invest in Public investments. I am fully capable of making my investment decisions on my own and am fully capable of understanding the risks should I choose to make them. I do not need to pass a test to demonstrate my investment acumen. The results of my investments will be the testament of my knowledge. This is beyond the role
The responsibility for researching the investments that are right for any investor fall solely on that investor. While larger organisations and managed portfolio funds have extensive risk-management and analysis algorithms at their disposal, a self-directed individual investor has only the resources they choose to rely on. This is their choice to use as much or as little research as they deem
I'm writing to let you know that I find it unconscionable that you would pass rules that prevent the public from making their own investment choices. There is no reason that those who have more money would have a right to invest in things that others would not. This sounds like a set up to make the rich, richer and the poor poorer. I and others are capable of working out the risks and
More regulations are NOT necessary. Retail investors should be able to freely choose what to invest in. Demanding us to pass tests or going through other special processes is annoying. Restrictions on retail customer access to complex products are even worse - they are unreasonable and unfair. As a leveraged fund investor, I always read through the information and assess risks before making an
I have been investing a long time and have bought individual stocks, bonds, ETFs. I have shorted the Market through ETFs. I realize the risks involved. Currently we are in a period where the major market indices are falling. Now is the perfect time to protect part of your portfolio with an ETF that shorts the market. It is like insurance on your home. The goal is to protect your investment. I
I not regulators should be able to choose the public
investments that are right for me and my family.
I don't want the government telling me what I can and can't do.
I've probably been investing longer than most of all of the appointees to the board. I've been investing for over 50 years. Why do you think I need your help?
Force disclosure of material
Dear FINRA, As a 64 year old physician who has been investing in stocks since 1998, I feel that I am quite competent to assess the risks of my various investment choices. Aside from stocks, bonds, and similar 'paper' assets, I have investments in both real estate and collectables. As such, I feel very strongly that despite what undoubtedly are good intentions, FINRA should refrain from
Another freedom of choice the Gov. is trying take from me, I have been Investing in Leveraged & Inverse Funds for many years, I fully understand the risks that apply and fully capable to deal with them.
Leverage & Inverse Funds are an important tool in my Investment strategy.
It is my right to invest my money as I see fit, I don't need you to guide me.
On the
I would prefer my right to invest in leveraged and inverse funds to remain unchanged. Sectioning off portions of the free market causes it to remain privileged to a select few. Everybody goes through elementary school and understands multiplication.
I utilize leveraged funds to take advantage of periods of high return on investment in the overall market. As a retail investor, it is very clear
