Another freedom of choice the Gov. is trying take from me, I have been Investing in Leveraged & Inverse Funds for many years, I fully understand the risks that apply and fully capable to deal with them.
Leverage & Inverse Funds are an important tool in my Investment strategy.
It is my right to invest my money as I see fit, I don't need you to guide me.
On the
I would prefer my right to invest in leveraged and inverse funds to remain unchanged. Sectioning off portions of the free market causes it to remain privileged to a select few. Everybody goes through elementary school and understands multiplication.
I utilize leveraged funds to take advantage of periods of high return on investment in the overall market. As a retail investor, it is very clear
I wish to comment that I oppose the restrictions proposed in the FINRA Regulatory Notice #22-08.
I feel I should (and the public in general), should be able to choose the investments that are best for my family. I utilize leveraged funds to seek better returns and hedge my investments as a minimal part of my portfolio, and the proposed regulatory notice would limit my returns. My broker already
I take extreme exception to your proposal to limit my access to buying any particular class of public funds. This is part of my investment strategy; I employ it as a hedge in my portfolio. It does not require special training or skills to understand the potential risks and benefits of using leveraged and inverse funds. It seems more likely to me that this is just another ploy of the privileged to
I am a long term investor. Leveraged and inverse funds are important to my investment strategy. They are a small, but important vehicle for hedging against dramatic swings in the market and are crucial to balancing my portfolio. I understand and accept the risks inherent to the use of inverse funds and do not need special tests in order to invest in them. I believe the proposed restrictions
FINRA Requests Comment on a Revised Proposal Regarding the Consolidated FINRA Rules Governing FINRA’s Membership Application Proceedings
I should be able to choose the public investments for me and my family.
I don't have to go through any special process like passing a test before I can invest in public securities, like leveraged funds. I understand the risk associated with leveraged funds.
I have been investing since the year 1995 and have a good knowledge of US stock market. I chose leveraged fund because Nasdaq will
What you are proposing is completely unethical and will only exacerbate the already growing wealth gap in America. A leveraged S&P 500 fund is an excellent vehicle growing wealth. Even people with just a few bucks in their Robinhood account can invest in it. You should drop your support for this bill for the same reason you wouldn't support the government doing this for
It is unlawful to restrict the general public from investing in leveraged or inverse funds. These funds, like most equities, carry risk of losing all principal and this is something all investors and traders are aware of with a simple acknowledgement on a disclosure. We should not have to demonstrate additional minimum qualifications to invest in these vehicles nor should they be restricted to
As an educated individual investor, I should be able to make investment decisions that are right for me and my family. I have a bachelors in engineering and a MBA. I shouldn't have to go through a special test before I can invest in public securities such as inverse and leveraged funds.
Leveraged and inverse funds are important part of my investment strategies. I use both leverage
