I do not wish to have regulations imposed on my ability to invest with my self directed funds. All funds have risks as do equities and I like the ability to manage my own monies and do not need a nanny to direct me to tell me that I cannot invest. The taking away of our freedoms to invest flies in the face of American values-the very thing I joined the military for. I literally went as I loved
I oppose restrictions to my right to invest in leveraged and inverse funds. These instruments should be available to the public, and not just a privileged few. They are an important part of investment strategy that can help me hedge/ protect my stocks investments, and sometimes help me achieve enhanced returns when I use them as a limited part of my overall portfolio. I should not have to go
Leveraged funds offer the chance to enhance the benefits from successful high-conviction investment ideas for those with limited funds available to invest. They can help build wealth faster, so anybody should be able to trade/invest in these funds without interference or regulatory obstacles if they consider it appropriate for their situation and are willing to take the risks involved.
I OPPOSE RESTRICTIONS TO MY RIGHT TO INVEST ON LEVERAGED INVESTMENTS
I, not regulators, should be able to choose the public investments that are right for me and my family.
Public investments should be available to all of the public, not just the privileged.
I shouldn't have to go through any special process like passing a test before you can invest in public securities, like leveraged
Thank you for the opportunity to comment on this. I believe everyone should be free to invest in whatever manner they choose. The governments role should be to prevent fraud. Beyond that it is the investors choice to educate themselves and decide what risks are worth bearing. No agency should attempt to protect investors from any type of investment. In fact, what ends up happening is these
It is none of your business what I choose to invest in, and you are not some god-like incredibly talented people. You are just typical government employees trying and failing to appear smarter than the rest of us. We do NOT need you or your rules to "protect" us from investment risks.
We all understand the stock market has become a casino which the SEC refuses to properly
I as an individual investor should be able to choose the investments that are right for me and my family, not just for the "high net-worth" accredited one-percenters. I should have to go through a process of passing a test before I can invest in public securities unless the government is willing to train individual investors like me and administer the test free of charge.
Please don't end or restrict our access to leveraged and inverse etf's. These etf's constitute an important part of many of our portfolios. Would you be making these changes because of perceived risk? These funds are FAR less risky than buying and selling options. Let us determine what investments are appropriate for us and our unique circumstances. Restricting
I OPPOSE RESTRICTIONS TO MY RIGHT TO INVEST My education - a Ph.D. from a university in the U.S. and mathematics as my Bachelor Degree's minor subject, I am capable of understanding leveraged and inverse funds and their risks. I - not regulators - should be able to choose the public investments that are right for me. I shouldn't have to go through any special process like taking a test
I have been active investor for over 20 years and have successfully managed my SEP IRA and investment accounts during that time. I should not be required to take any tests to invest in any stocks including leveraged and inverse funds. In particular, leveraged and inverse funds allow me to take advantage opportunities using less capital as well as hedge risk. Please do not restrict and/or make it
