I oppose restrictions to my right to invest in public investments, I shouldn't have to go through any special process before I invest in public securities such leveraged and inverse funds. I understand their risk involved. public investments should be available to all of the public, not just the privileged. I do not need these measures imposed on me, leveraged and inverse funds are
Message to regulators; As an investor, I am totally opposed to restricting my rights to invest or make public investments. Also, as an investor, no one decides more than me which public investmens are suitable for my financial goals. Public investmens must also available to the public and not only to the privileged. In addition, as an investor, I do not have to go through a special process, such
I want to let you know that I think I should be able to choose the public investments that are best for me. I am college educated and fully capable of understanding and making my own financial decisions without any special government restrictions. If we want the middle class in America to continue to advance we must not put too many restrictions in place. Those restrictions just help the rich get
I am not opposed to additional disclosures. However onerous requirements on net worth or certifications will only keep the poorest among us distant from complex financial tool and lead to increase the disparity between rich and poor. Given the long term results of one of the most popular leveraged etf,TQQQ, this really seems like a ploy that helps the wealthy by limiting the upward mobility of
Prohibited Independent Research in the Age of Artificial Intelligence: Don’t Do It, by Jennifer LaMont, Regional Manager, FINRA Southeast Region and other news.
Our stock market is the most popular in the world. And thats because its of the people, for the people, and by the people. I understand the need for regulation and Id say that FINRA is doing a great job thus far. But touching investment tools that make retail investors like myself a tad bit stronger is simply an undemocratic move on part of the regulators. One who is capable of trading stocks, is
It is incumbent upon me to voice my objection to the consideration by FINRA to restrict my ability to invest in public securities and their risks without first demonstrating my understanding or abilities to a governmental agency. As part of my financial portfolio, investing in leveraged and reverse funds allows me to take part in the great American dream of developing wealth. It is important
As a Financial Advisor, we have a small portion of our practice that uses leveraged and inverse ETFs in our clients accounts. We fully understand the risks involved. We employ multiple analytics in our decision making process, and use an active trading system in an attempt to mitigate the risks. The long-term results can be quite substantial for our clients. We feel it would not be in our clients
Government should have no role in regulating investment strategies a citizen uses to manage his/her financial wellbeing. Tax regulations are already doing this. Free and open trading environment are essential in creating a fair environment. I am just an average citizen that manage my own IRA and have been trading for over 25 years. The proposed regulation hand cuffs me from effectively manage my
I believe that we as Americans have have the right to decide if we want to invest in any form of investment that benefits us no matter what our income or financial standing is. Regulating any person or adding restrictions to a persons rights to invest is a form of discrimination and disparity. Segregating the rich from the poor. My question is what is the real reason to restrict any person from
