1. Enforcement should be as immediate as possible. 2. Transparency : Give detailed numbers, company names and extended information on your investigation. 3. Bigger fines. Let's be real. The fines you're giving are symbolic. What's even the point exactly? 4. Kinda unrelated but maybe the best way to enforce those ruled is for finra to cease to exist? And be replaced by a public
Comments: Please do not modify rules related to leveraged ETFs. I personally understand the risks of leveraged ETFs, but at the same time the value. I use leveraged ETFs to enhance my portfolio returns. I also recognize that these products may result in larger than average swings in valuation. However, if you look at a long-term strategy of using leveraged ETFs, you will recognize that these
The proposed rule that would restrict MY investments choices is incompatible with a free society. I am an adult and make my own decisions in regards to all aspects of my life, including my investments. FINRA has no role in restricting those decisions. I fully understand what a leveraged fund is, and what an inverse fund is, but that is not the main point. The main point is I should not, after 20
Dear SEC, How dare you go after these instruments. Focus more of your energy on companies which do insider trading and when you do give fines they cannot be less than the money made. Inverse funds and short selling and leveraged funds give some advantages to average investors that institutional investors dont need. Please reconsider thiese "rules". Banks should not trade FDIC leveraged
I am against SEC Proposed Rule #S7-24-15. I not regulators should be able to choose the public investments that are right for myself and my family. Public investments should be available to all of the public, not just the privileged. I use covered call options on inverse and leveraged funds to make money, regardless of the market direction. Yes, there are risks, but they are risks I understand
The investment landscape is currently regulated at a high level. While I understand the importance of ensuring that nefarious inversely schemes are kept at bay, the ones who do follow the guides, rules and laws should be allowed. These types of investments give me hope that I will actually be able to retire someday without reliance on social security which is a bloated beast. Funds such as
This new purposed Rule is very concerning and cause's more harm than good, It is not the job of Regulator's to decide what individuals can purchase.The autonomy of what an individual buys with their own money, that should be in there hands, only their Hands. allowing individual investors to utilize these tool, provides access to more affordable professional strategy's! THIS IS OVER
It is my opinion the markets should be as transparent and fair across all avenues. The lack of transparency and information tilts the scale away from the retail investor and in turn causes distrust towards further involvement. Short information should be required to be disclosed to accurately guage the status and balance of a trade, and to rule out any potential foul play or bad actors.
Comments on Day Trading Disclosure StatementPlease see comments with underline or strikethrough.Day-Trading Risk Disclosure StatementYou should consider the following points before engaging in a day-trading strategy. For purposes of this notice, a "day-trading strategy" means an overall trading strategy characterized by the aggressive and regular transmission by a customer of intra-day
Guidance regarding use of related performance information in sales material for private equity funds.
