I prefer making my own investment decisions versus regulators who can manage their own assets BUT need to learn to leave my decisions up to me. Unless they are actively trading their own assets and clients' retail assets, I find their wanting to rule on these matters self-serving, ignorant to peoples' rights to educate, learn and wisely choose and highly unreliable to ethical
Your Proposed Rule #S7--24-15 is a flagrant and unwarranted intrusion on the rights of individuals to invest as they chose. Who gives you the right to decide what instruments people can invest in? Peoples' freedom to invest as they chose should not be compromised by a self-appointed body of regulators who are overstepping their boundaries. As long as one educates his/herself on what they
Comments: As someone with the CFA designation that uses triple leveraged funds for their personal investment strategy, I do not feel that this rule should be passed. In economic downturns line were are experiencing, the use of triple leverage funds can be extremely advantageous for investors that understand the risks associated with such investments and track their investment performance.
I strongly oppose SEC Proposed Rule #S7-24-15, which is to unreasonably restrict my right and benefit to make the best of cryptocurrency ETFs as one of core segments of my ETF portofolio. With the recent growing liquidity for cryptocurrency, I cannot sense any peculiar risk characteristics in cryptocurrency ETFs, compared to more commodity ETFs or FX ETFs. Also, with the recent jump in inflation
I am very concerned about the potential for regulatory over reach in controlling the management of personal portfolios, particularly hedging opportunities presented by leveraged ETFs. I object to new rules. Margin requirement management by brokers is most effective. Do not become a nanny state. No value in that, except for ineffective bureaucracies. I am retired but worked in the industry for my
The only change that should be made if any is that one should be ablento take a test or quick quiz that proves knowledge of these products and then also sign an acknowledgement and the same should be done for the PDT rule. One is kidding themselves if they think changes here will protect anyone as that would imply that the regulatory body has the right to save people from themselves. They don
Amendments to the SEC’s Financial Reporting Requirements—eFOCUS System Updates and Annual Audit Requirements
FINRA and ISG Announce Extension of Effective Date for Certain Electronic Blue Sheet Data Elements and Updates to Certain Requestor and Exchange Codes
SUGGESTED ROUTING
Senior ManagementLegal & ComplianceOperationsSystemsTrading
Executive Summary
On July 28, 1994, the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) approved an NASD rule change that deals with clearance and settlement requirements applicable to NASD member firms functioning as market makers in The Nasdaq Stock Market™ (Nasdaq) or the OTC Bulletin Board Service (OTCBB®).
SEC Approves Proposed Rule Change to Amend the Submission Agreement and Related Rules in the Arbitration Codes for Customer and Industry Disputes