Individual investors have been excluded from the advantages of large trading firms and lawmakers. Taking away individual investor RIGHTS to invest in leveraged & Inverse funds is just another ball & chain on individuals in their strides towards financial independence from Government. If an individual had invested in a triple leveraged S&P index fund for the last 10 years,
Ladies and Gentlemen: By limiting access to any investment opportunities you block any of us who are trying to improve our lives from investing you lock us from being able to improve. There is already in place on some things restrictions defined as an accredited investor. If you block us from being able to invest you doom us to classes of rich and poor and the middle class merging in with the
I OPPOSE RESTRICTIONS TO MY RIGHT TO INVEST!
I should be able to choose the public investments that are right for my family and I. Public investments should be available to all of the public, not just the privileged.
I should not have to go through a special process like passing an SAT before I can invest in public securities. My wife and I both hold advanced degrees and have been in business
During the 2007-2009 Financial Crisis, inverse funds saved my retirement. I also have occasionally used leveraged funds because of a 24-hr shortage of "settled" funds. I do not want or need the protection afforded by the proposed measures. The Fed has routinely created bubbles in various asset classes, incentivizing investors to use leveraged long funds as the bubble expands.
Ladies and Gentlemen,
As a retired RIA and portfolio manager who spent more than 25 years managing assets and advising private clients, I object to FINRA's Notice #22-08 proposing to limit access to leveraged and inverse ETFs. While there will always be a handful of novice and unsophisticated clients who may harm themselves by trading financial instruments they don't fully
I am very concerned about recent intentions to limit the publics ability to invest in leveraged and/or inverse funds. No one knows better what investments are right for me than me. I should not be required to prove myself to anyone before being allowed to invest my hard earned money where I see fit. The whole idea of the nanny state where the government needs to take care of me is extremely
I oppose restrictions to investing in leveraged ETF's for individual investors. WE all get the information regarding risks to investing in these funds and as such should be permitted to buy, sell and hold these as we see fit based on our personal financial goals and needs. It is not democratically fair to restrict these funds to large investment firms, which would force individual
SUGGESTED ROUTING
Legal & ComplianceOperationsSystemsTrading
As of May 25, 1994, the following 65 issues joined the Nasdaq National Market®, bringing the total number of issues to 3,653:
Symbol
Company
Entry Date
SOESSM Execution Level
BUCK
Buckhead America Corporation
4/28/94
200
MLXR
MLX Corp.
4/28/94
200
ABCO
American Buildings Company
4/29/94
500
BRKB
I oppose the regulations being considered by the Financial Industry Regulatory Authority. I have the right to choose which public investments I want to invest in. This should not be taken away to benefit only those with high net worth or a privileged few. I do not believe any process needs to be implemented in order to invest in leveraged and inverse funds. I already use them as important
I believe all individuals willing to invest in publicly traded assets should have complete freedom to invest in whatever investment they deem appropriate for themselves. Especially in a day and age when there is already so much public disclosure and free financial education, one should be able to invest in any public asset he or she believes fits them and their risk profile. These investments
