I not regulators should be able to choose the public
investments that are right for me and my family.
Public investments should be available to all of the public,
not just the privileged.
I shouldn't have to go through any special process
like passing a test before you can invest in public securities, like leveraged and inverse funds. I am capable of understanding
Im 58 years old. I have more than ten years of investing experience and have amassed more than three millions in stock assets, mainly by using leveraged ETFs to take advantage of severe market sell offs such as 2008 financial crisis and Covid-19 pandemic. I have found that the leveraged ETFs are extremely powerful investing tools for experienced and responsible long-term investors like myself who
Please DO NOT remove any of my current investment options, including leveraged ETFs. Many consumers are preeminently qualified to understand and consider all types of investments. Currently there are safeguards in place to make sure people are able to make decisions about certain types of investments. In my case I am Series 6, 7, 63, and 65 licensed and fully understand the risks of leveraged
I do not agree with FINRA's proposal of restricting access to leveraged ETFs. I am an educated investor and should be able to choose the public investments that are right for me and my family. Public investments should be available to all of the public, not just the privileged. I have used leveraged ETFs prudently and as short term trades to increase my returns and wealth. I have used
I believe i should be able to choose the public investments that are right for me. Public investments should be available to all of the public and not just the privileged.
I shouldn't have to go through any special process
before I can invest in public securities. I am capable of understanding leveraged and inverse funds and their risks. I do not need these measures imposed on me.
I should be able to choose the public
investments that are right for me and my family.
Public investments should be available to all of the public,
not just the privileged.
I shouldn't have to go through any special process
like passing a test before you can invest in public securities,
like leveraged and inverse funds. I have been investing in leveraged and inverse
I write to oppose any rule or regulation that limits leveraged ETF positions to one day or access to leveraged ETFs. I am a retail investor that has done a lot of research on leveraged ETFs, am comfortable with the risk, and have invested a portion of my portfolio that I am comfortable with in leveraged products and plan to hold long term. If positions were limited to a single day, I would be
As a retail investor who does my own homework, I don’t need more regulation from a nongovernmental organization. Using inverse ETFs when I deem them appropriate has helped my retirement funds gain 9% YTD, whereas commonly traded ETFs like SPY, QQQ, and TLT are down 12-20% YTD. Perhaps you’d first like to explain to the Fed that inflation is not “transitory”? Or perhaps explain to them the
I strongly oppose restrictions on my right to invest in leveraged and inverse funds. Regulators should not be able to choose the public investments that are right for my family and I. These should be available to everyone, not only the privileged. I am fully capable of understanding leveraged and inverse funds and their risks. I do not need these measures imposed on me. Leveraged and inverse
Comments:
While optics are ever present around good consumer advocacy policy, creating regulatory burden is not a good way to go about this.
In the strong capitalistic financial environment that the US exists in, retail investors should have the ability to put their money in Leveraged-Inverse ETFs if they so choose as long as they are aware of the long-term risks of holding such financial
