Investing on any asset class should be a personal decision. Those investors that do our due diligence to educate ourselves before investing and that may not be considered 'high net worth' should be able to have the same opportunities than 'high net worth' companies and individuals. I understand the risks and time decay of leverage investments and do not need to
Dear Sir:
I am writing you to oppose restrictions to my right to invest.
I should be able to choose the public available investments that right for me. Public investments should be available to all of the public, not just the privileged. I should not have to go through any special process like passing a test before I can invest in public securities, like leveraged and inverse funds. I an
To Whom It May Concern:
I am opposed to the proposed FINRA action (Notice #22-08) limiting my ability to utilize leveraged and inverse in my overall portfolio investments.
I should be able to choose the public investments that are right for me and my family.
Public investments should be available to all of the public, not just the privileged.
I understand leveraged and inverse funds and their
I'm writing because I'm invested in funds such as BITO. It has come to my attention that FINRA wants to regulate these in such a way that investors are required to become accredited, pass tests, get special approval, cooling off periods, etc. I disagree with this and believe anyone should be allowed to invest in public securities with their own money, without government scrutiny. Laws
Although I am opposed to restriction of access to complex investments for anyone, I fully support efforts to ensure that consumers are provided full disclosure in layman's/non-financial-professional terms about the complexities and risks that may effect their investing and investments. Many reputable major brokerages seem to do a decent job of providing investor classification and risk-
Hello, I am very concerned about your proposed regulations on investing. As I am an adult and a head of household spending my money, I should have the final say on how I invest it. I fully understand the risks of investing and don't need to be tested on the subject. I do not need a cooling off period, because i research investments, and I certainly don't need someone's permission
TLDR. I got an idea, instead of pretending the stock market is not a casino under house rules FINRA should explain the house rules in a 1 page document that everyone can read. The rules should include which parties can naked short sale with ridiculous margin on which stocks, which stocks will permanently cyclically fail to deliver and why, and why the DTCC has an obligation warehouse that the
To the Financial Industry Regulatory Authority: I stand strongly opposed to regulatory efforts that limit my right to invest in leveraged and inverse funds. As a non-professional investor, I am nonetheless capable of understanding the risks of leveraged and inverse funds, and have used these funds prudently to diversify my portfolio. I do not need government oversight of how I invest my money,
First of all, thank you for letting me know about this. I know enough about leveraged and inverse funds and am constantly dealing with their risks. And I am constantly striving to acquire for a lot of knowledge and information. Therefore, I oppose any restrictions or other testing measures on my investment rights. Currently, the leveraged stocks I focus on invest in because they are made up of
I write to oppose any rule or regulation that limits leveraged ETF positions to one day or access to leveraged ETFs. I am a retail investor that has done a lot of research on leveraged ETFs, am comfortable with the risk, and have invested a portion of my portfolio that I am comfortable with in leveraged products and plan to hold long term. If positions were limited to a single day, I would be
