I not regulators should be able to choose the public investments that are right for you and your family. Public investments should be available to all of the public, not just the privileged. I shouldn't have to go through any special process like passing a test before you can invest in public securities, like leveraged and inverse funds. Explain that you are capable of understanding
To whom it may concern I use inverse etfs to protect my downside when the institutions decide to tank the market u should be taking a closer look at the institutions that control the market I have the right to protect myself when they do this I use a very small portion of my cash I don't take risks I can't do anything about my mutuals that they crush when they tank the market unless I
Hi FINRA Committee Members, I don't believe it is fair that you are trying to regulate leveraged and inverse funds. I understand the risks in using them, and have used them successfully in the past. I find them to be easier trading vehicles than using options and I use them as a way to keep my portfolio hedged and to play short term swing trades during uncertain times. If others don't
Leveraged ETFs and inverse ETFs give individual investors reliable tools with which to hedge against market downturns. The leverage on the short side for inverse ETFs allows them to hold a smaller position against existing longer-term holdings as a hedge in the same manner that professionals use futures to achieve the same goal. On the long side, they allow investors to participate in market
I totally reject the government restricting my access to investment products that are properly and transparently marketed and regulated with regards to their upside and downside risks. I totally reject any attempts of the government to extend any exclusion of public markets to exacerbate the wealth disparity we already have. Please spend your time and our taxpayer money on the following: #
It feels like all these additional hurdles and restrictions are being considered to benefit the larger hedge funds and money managers and restrict individual investors from access. I have always been able to choose the type of investments that are right for me and my family, I understand the risks as well as benefits to investing. I am an adult and would like to continue the freedom of choice in
I have been investing in leveraged and inversed funds, as one of my strategies, for over twenty years and have a very good understanding of my investments. Now, with your proposed rule, you are taking away my freedom to select how I invest in a well respected investment selection. If you want to control, which you seem to want to do, go after crypto, because it is going to cost investors big time
I strongly oppose the proposed FINRA regulation that would restrict my ability to easily invest in public securities that FINRA deems "complex products" such as leveraged and inverse funds. I am capable of understanding the risk issues related to these investments and I don't need any nanny state to "protect" me from making bad choices. I use such investments, which are a
A Changing Industry – A Changing FINRA
Good morning, and thank you Chip [Jones, FINRA’s Head of Member Relations and Education]. We all owe a debt of gratitude to Chip and his fantastic team for once again organizing an excellent conference, including more than 50 expert panel discussions that will help us better protect and serve investors.
I look forward to the honor of welcoming our keynote
FINRA's new rules for evolving work models — hybrid and remote —provide member firms greater flexibility for their registered persons to work from home. Our new Residential Supervisory Location (RSL) Rule and Remote Inspections Pilot Program Rule are intended to provide member firms greater flexibility — not less — to allow eligible registered persons to work from home, following the expiration of temporary COVID-19 relief from existing requirements.
