I do not appreciate the government telling me what the right investments are for my family. I also do not like the government making one set of rules for the middle class and another for high net worth individuals on wall street. Please leave crypto investing alone, there were 85,000 new millionaires from cryptocurrency alone last year and I like to invest in worthwhile projects in that space.
Government regulators must not impose arbitrary restrictions on private investors.
Many capital investments carry risk. Leveraged and inverse funds are central to my investment strategies, and I do not need -- nor will I appreciate -- interference with my basic right to purchase, hold, and trade them.
There is no legally-coherent or ethically-defensible rationale for adding additional
NASD has filed with the SEC a proposed rule change to NASD By-Laws, Schedule A, Section 1(b)(3) to amend its Trading Activity Fee ("TAF"). NASD is amending the TAF to adjust the rates for covered equity securities. In addition, NASD is renumbering certain subsections included in Section 1.
I am strongly opposed to any new regulations that would hinder an investor's ability to navigate today's complex markets. Tools such as leveraged and inverse funds are critical to the ability to hedge a portfolio. In fact, I find the existing rules to be somewhat arbitrary and onerous.
More regulation does not help the individual investor but rather, undermines their ability to
It seems that every day there is a new government restriction on the citizens of this country. Wear a mask, get a jab, do this, don't do that, over and over and over. This is just one more power grab by the ruling class, one more attempt to exclude citizens from what they have, to restrict our freedom to live as WE see fit, not subject to a "test" or a qualification
Hello, I have been buying crypto currency and crypto funds since early 2021. I am unhappy that till date SEC has not made decision on what rules should apply to crypto. Since January 2022 the whole crypto group has been in decline. The decline is due to SEC inability to make decision within appropriate time. Please don't make new restrictions that I should pass a test in order to buy
I oppose further regulations to public investing. It is my humble opinion that instead of trying to implement radical and unprecedented regulations to restrict public trading that you focus your time and energy on educating the general public. I believe the regulations proposed by Rule #22-08 will help continue the current trend of the rich getting richer and the poor getting poorer. I have been
"A vibrant market is at its best when it works for everyone."
"FINRA provides confidence to participate by safeguarding market integrity."
These two quotes are directly from the main page of your website. If FINRA is interested in protecting investors and providing a level playing field, then this proposed regulation is the very antithesis to that notion.
All
I'm writing in opposition to proposed rules that would limit the public investor from investing in inverse and leveraged funds. I find it insulting that you feel you know better than the investor how to best analyze risks and formulate investment strategy. I feel that I, as well as most retail investors are perfectly capable of making investment decisions including using such funds in