We not regulators should be able to choose the public investments that are right for us and our family. Public investments should be available to all of the public, not just the privileged.
We shouldn't have to go through any special process like passing a test before we can invest in public securities, like leveraged and inverse funds. We are capable of understanding leveraged and
As a free citizen of the fine country, I should be without hinderance in my investment decisions. I do not need these restrictions on my investment decisions, that should not be the role of Government. Complex securities allow me as an educated investor to capitalize on my investment theses. Limiting my access to such securities will result in a loss of profit and an overall delimiting of my
I should be able to choose the public investments that are right for my family. Public investments should be available to all of the public, not just the privileged. I shouldn't have to go through any special process like passing a test before I can invest in public securities, like leveraged and inverse funds. I am capable of understanding leveraged and inverse funds and their risks.
As an individual investor, I will OBJECT too much regulatory requirements on investors. It will NOT protect small investors, instead of creates confusion and overhead (which will be added to investors in some way). Most stocks aren't less risky than leveraged and inverse funds are.
Any proposal that testing specialized investment knowledge, demonstrate a high net worth and go though a
I am a small investor who would like to continue to choose my own investments, including the ones that this FINRA rule would restrict as too "complex". I've spent considerable time educating myself on investment theory and the value of a diversified portfolio, and I use a mix of "complex" and conservative investments to match my goals and risk
Dear Regulator/FINRA I am happy to learn of your concern for investors. I am fully aware of the risks involved in buying inverse shares. We are forced to read a prospectus before we invest in these funds. I feel that I should be able to buy any funds of my choice in a 'free' country. I also know that these funds are not usually held for a very long time. I really don't feel that
I should be able to choose the public investments that are right for my individual and family savings. I am capable of understanding leverage and inverse funds and their risks. I do not need these measures imposed on me.
Leveraged and inverse funds are important investment strategies. I use them to help hedge, seek enhanced returns, and for overall portfolio construction purposes. These are
Ive used leveraged investments for years now. It an important investment strategy in my portfolio. I understand the ratio against its common etf (3) I tend to buy when the market is in bear territory. Thus improving my chance of success. Its NOT rocket science. I also recognize that its risky for nervous investors who are fearful. I keep these investments presently low in value and only increase
I am a self-directed and self-educated investor who got a late start building wealth due to many years of school. The use of leveraged ETFs has helped me and my family to build significant wealth, especially coming out of the pandemic, and has helped me become closer to financial security. It is no understatement to say that leveraged ETFs have taken a huge burden off my shoulders. I am aware
I am, in general, opposed to the need for additional barriers of entry to use leveraged and inverse funds. The existing regulations require stockbrokers to monitor age and balances of accounts, and already quiz traders on their experience using such investment tools. There is always a risk no matter what the investment, and there's no real difference between leveraged/inverse funds and
