To FINRA,
As a professional in the investment industry, I strongly feel the disclosures regarding investment performance and risk are well communicated and transparent regarding leveraged ETFs. It is very simple to understand those products that have 2x or 3x leveraged being specified as DAILY performance.
To limit the ability to invest in those products or to remove them completely would create
- It's abhorrent that regulators are proposing to choose the public investments that are right for me (not regulators). By definition public investments should be available to everyone, not just those who are of high net worth or in privileged positions. - I am university educated and capable of understanding both leveraged and inverse funds and the risks. I shouldn't have to jump
I oppose restrictions on my right to invest in public investments.
I should be able to choose the public investments that are right for me. Public investments should be available to all of the public, not just the privileged.
I shouldn't have to go through any special process like passing a test before I can invest in public securities, like leveraged and inverse funds. I am capable of
In the past 40 years, federal policy has increasingly placed responsibility for retirement saving squarely on the shoulders of individuals. It is highly inappropriate for the government to assign that burden to individuals, then limit or restrict the sorts of investment vehicles available to individual investors. That includes leveraged funds, which, when the associated risk is properly managed
I am writing to express my objection on restrictions on investment for the working class people. The idea that I should not have the right to invest in ways that I so chose is something I would expect from Russia not the USA. Regulations such as these only serve the rich at the expense of the middle class. Our country has seen too many politicians taking rights away from its citizens. Everyone
I not regulators should be able to choose the public
investments that are right for me and my family.
Public investments should be available to all of the public not just the privileged.
I shouldn't have to go through any special process
like passing a test before I can invest in public securities, like leveraged and inverse funds I am capable of understanding leveraged and
While I understand the need for, and value of, some regulations to insure that unsophisticated investors do not utilize inverse or leveraged funds to their detriment, I do not believe those regulations should be unduly restrictive. Specifically, I do not support required testing or mandatory cooling off periods. I already accept the requirement for demonstrating appropriate net worth and getting
Good day, I am deeply opposed to restricting any of my rights on investing. I am a free thinking adult and as such have the right to invest my money in any way I see fit. I should forever have free access to any and all types of investments without special testing or vetting.
By doing it is my belief that only a elite class/group of people will have access to certain investments. This is simply
Please I not regulators should be able to choose the public investments that are right for you and your family. Public investments should be available to all of the public, not just the privileged I You shouldn't have to go through any special process like passing a test before you can invest in public securities, like leveraged and inverse funds. Explain that you are capable of
To whom it may concern;
I strongly oppose the proposed restrictions to certain public investments deemed too "complex" for a number of different reasons.
First and foremost, I value freedom. I do not want my freedom to access and invest in a broad range of investment products to be restricted. Public investments should be available to the public and not just a privileged few who
