I was unaware until recently that you [REDACTED] might be hatching another scheme to interfere with my ability to hedge risk and/or speculate in the financial markets. Even to the regulatory mind it should be obvious that investors either find these products useful or they avoid them, a principle that applies to all the ETFs and ETNs in the marketplace. Your franchise doesn't empower you to
Leveraged funds are important for young small time investors like myself to be able to have access to similar financial vehicles that large investors and institutions are able to use. I use the LETF's to be able to construct a balanced 60/40 portfolio that provides a higher risk-adjusted return than a stand alone index fund would be able to. Imo, there are many stocks that bare much
I fail to understand why this issue has resurfaced. I do not feel that I need financial advisor or someone to protect me from myself. This very dangerous territory. If I should not invest in inverse or leveraged funds, maybe I should not invest in start-ups, or penny stocks, or any stock that does not meet with a regulators political opinion. We have far too much WOKE control now.
I have used
Hurts Investors: It could potentially deny you the freedom to choose investments that could
help you achieve long-term financial security.
Is Arbitrary and Unworkable: FINRAs definition of complex products is so broad, arbitrary and vague that it could ensnare a vast number of commonly used public securities. Tests or
criteria to determine investor understanding are subjective and could lead to
To whom it may concern:
It has come to my attention that FINRA is considering significant and severe restrictions on my right to select my own investment vehicles. I don't need "a parent" to oversee my investments and protect me from myself. Candidly, I think this is an overreach of government powers. I am an experienced investor with a background in the financial
Please allow unrestricted availability of leveraged in inverse ETF's. Many private individuals are choosing to manage their own retirement and investment funds. These instruments provide hedging and seasonal positioning according to market conditions. We simply believe that a hired professional would not put as much attention into the changing market environment as we do.
FINRAs scheme is misguided because it: Hurts Investors: It could potentially deny us the freedom to choose investments that could help us achieve long-term financial security. Is Arbitrary and Unworkable: FINRAs definition of complex products is so broad, arbitrary and vague that it could ensnare a vast number of commonly used public securities. Tests or Upends Our Regulatory System: Under the
The proposed additional regulation regarding limiting access and tradability of inverse, leveraged and volatility ETPs is nonsensical and plain wrong. Investing is a way for the masses to generate wealth, one small chunk at a time. Not everyone needs to be an accredited investor in order to be able to buy more complicated financial products than common stock and government bonds. Quite the
Not allowing citizens the ability to invest in inverse or leveraged funds based on that person's net worth or specialize skill is unfair and unwise. I would be unable to hedge my investments in rocky times. Rather than protecting investors from potential losses, these rules would subject them to unnecessary losses. These regulations would not help the average investor and more than
I (the People) should be able to invest in what I want, NOT what you think. That;s just too much regulation (Micromanaging)
I am more than capable of understanding complex investments; if you want to fix ignorance; then we need to FIX OUR SCHOOL SYSTEM to teach our young valuable financial Life Skill.
I (the people) am capable of understanding what I don't know and research it. That is
