I vigorously oppose any and all restrictions to my right to invest how I see fit for my family and our unique circumstances, including limitations or prohibitions on investing in leveraged and/or inverse ETFs. I am retired and have been investing many years and understand the complexities and risks of the products in which I invest. Elitists in the government should not be dictating the
To Whom It May Concern:
I want to express my concern against for the proposed regulation that would limit or eliminate my ability in invest the leveraged and inverse ETFs which I currently have in my portfolio that I personally manage. I have used these effectively for years to grow my wealth and therefore:
> I, not regulators, should be able to choose the public investments that are
Ive been recently informed of you trying to impose regulations & restrictions disqualifying normal people/investors from investing into crypto funds. I wanted to express my concern to everyone involved in hurting my portfolio & stopping me from investing into crypto funds such as BITO. I myself should be able to choose my own investments which are right for me, I take financial
Hello FINRA, I have been using leveraged ETF's in my portfolio using a strategy based on an algorithm that helps me decide when to buy and sell and I have been successful using this strategy. I have a firm belief that I, not the regulators should be able to choose the investments that are right for myself and my family. Public investments should be available to all of the public,
IMO this is excessive overreach by regulators. There is very little about leveraged or inverse funds that is any more complicated than their ordinary counterparts or mutual funds. I would venture to estimate that fewer than 1% of mutual fund owners could name the top three holdings in any mutual fund they have. Most of these inverse funds are even simpler: they have basically ONE holding. How is
I used to day trade, buying and selling options and penny stocks. I specifically quit those risky behaviors because I saw a more stable opportunity in leveraged ETFs. It allows me to gain the most out of my investments, which I make with my hard-earned money.
I always thought that this country was built on the principle that *anyone* could work hard and live free. I'm a grown adult who
To whom it may concern,
I oppose restrictions on my right as a US citizen to invest in PUBLIC investments as this SEC Proposed Rule #S7-24-15 is trying to do. As an investor, I should be able to choose the investments that are right for me & my family. Public investments are just that - investments that need to be available to ALL of the public, not just those who have large
Please reconsider making any changes to the current regulations
for leveraged and inverse funds. I should be able to choose the
public investments that are right for me and my family. Public
investments should be available to all of the public, not just the
privileged.
I should not have to go through any special process,like passing a test before I can invest in public securities, leveraged and
Dear Sir, Mdm,
I want to make a clear statement about my need to be able to trade LEVERAGED AND INVERSE FUNDS. I am now able to buy a house, and pay for the education of my two children, thanks to my trading of the last years.
I believe I not regulators should be able to choose the public investments that are right for you and your family. Public investments should be available to all of the
- I am just a regular investor, I should be able to choose the public investments that are right for me. Public investments should be available to all of the public, not just the privileged.
- I shouldn't have to go through any special process like passing a test before I can invest in public securities, like leveraged and inverse funds. I invested in options years ago. I understand
