I feel that the current system of allowing Hedge funds, and wealthy investors to run rampant on Wall Street shorting stocks into oblivion only to slight the retail investor. Overleveraging themselves into positions based on pride and ego and then expecting the American Taxpayer to foot the bill when they go bankrupt and lose people's retirement and 401k is absolutely appalling. Selling
I opposed restrictions on my right to invest like the wealthy and banks to advance my returns. Whats next our voting rights? I have produce significant extra returns and advance my chances to retire comfortably and early by reading the prospectus about swaps and leveraging and by correctly position sizing. Your proposed regulation is discrinatory. This is part of the reason behind income
Summary
FINRA is introducing enhancements and presentation changes in the Central Registration Depository (CRD®) system that relate to the implementation of FINRA’s restructured qualification examination program and the adoption of consolidated FINRA registration rules. These changes, effective October 1, 2018, principally affect the Examination Requests and SRO Registrations sections.
Dear FINRA, Thank you in advance for hearing me out. I oppose regulation that would require testing, verification of net worth, broker approvals, paused trading periods, and other burdens that would inhibit my ability to control my investments and financial future. Hedge funds and inverse funds are an important part of my portfolio and allow me to protect my retirement portfolio. Additional
I strongly object to your proposal to limit my ability to invest in leveraged/inverse instruments. I am currently retired, age 85 & of sound mind & body. I am more than capable to use my own judgement without federal government interference. In fact at this time I am invested several million dollars in leveraged instruments & am besting major market averages by
Wait!!! Youll let hedge funds and other large investors take risks- that is basically bet against the market but you want to restrict that to investors who dont have the money clout but have the smarts. What a scam. Protect the wealthy tax ball out folks but dont protect the investors trying to fund retirement and college funding. Yes its risky, but without taking risk we are then stuck with
To whom it concerns at the FINRA. I have heard that y'all are considering adding regulations to leverage and inverse funds. I strongly oppose additional regulations as I believe such regulations will burden investors and our saving goals. Regulators should not be in charge which public investments I would like to choose, they already regulate 14% of our salaries for social security.
Please don't interfere with a person's choices of investments by imposing requirements on them to make them conform to some standard that seems right to you.
I have found that trust administrators refuse to allow cash to go into leveraged funds, yet for me the returns on money I manage for myself have far exceeded anything they have been able to deliver. They provide the
While requiring disclosure of additional information regarding complex financial products seems good in principle, it seems quite possible that this will be yet another textual agreement that almost nobody reads and most people click through. Figuring out who needs the information provided and how to present it in a way that they will understand it seems important.
However, requiring testing to
I should be able to decide where to invest my hard earned money. The stock is owned by stockholders - not the government. Regulation will just keep those who have lots of money and big business in control of the market while keeping the larger public out of being able to invest where we want to. I already have no income from the company I retired from (not like the good old days) and I use my
