To whom it may concern.
While I am not an investment professional, I an a United
States Citizen. It is my right to spend and invest my money as I see fit, regardless of the outcome.
Since the government began trying to "protect me" by establishing large failed programs such as SSI, My ability to provide for my family and retirement has been severely constrained.
I would suggest
I fit all the normal requirements for suitability to buy such things as ProShares. I owned AGQ in my Roth IRA. I am a retired VP Investments from a regional brokerage firm, sufficient net worth and income, full options trading experience and qualification and was forced by the compliance guy where my account is currently to divest this security due to its complex and risky nature and the upcoming
To Whom This May Concern,
I have been investing for many years and manage my own retirement planning. I would like to be able to choose what investments I make. The government should not be trying to protect me from my own choices. Everyone should be able to participate in investing as they see fit and to their own risk tolerance level. I do not object to educational info on riskier
Summary
Effective September 1, 2021, FINRA is amending its rulebook to eliminate the Order Audit Trail System (OATS) rules in the FINRA Rule 7400 Series and FINRA Rule 4554 (Alternative Trading Systems — Recording and Reporting Requirements of Order and Execution Information for NMS Stocks) (collectively referred to as the “OATS Rules”). FINRA has determined that the accuracy and
Dear regulators, I greatly oppose the attempts to change my ability to make investments.I get to decide how, when, where, and how much of my money I get to invest, not you. Public investments should be available to all the public without going through any hoops or passing exams you deem necessary. I am perfectly capable of understanding my investments and the risks those investments entail.
It sounds like you want to take away my choice and right to hire someone to take care of my investments. I am totally against this move. It feels like an intrusion into my life. An intrusion into the time and money I invested in setting aside monies to provide for my myself and my family in my retirement.
There is so much wrong stated in this proposed change!!!
The statement "This
Hello,
As an active investor, recently retired, my family and I depend on intelligent use of leveraged ETFs to grow and sustain our portfolio.
I oppose any restrictions on retail investors to use leveraged, inverse or volatility index related ETFs.
These leveraged ETFs are simply a reasonably straight forward alternative investment, which generally consists of options contracts related
My ability to study market trends and use a small portion of my retirement account to invest in an inverse leveraged fund, has been a wonderful tool for me. It has allowed me to make postive gains while my regular 401k has dropped in value. I want my rights as a small investor to be honored, and not infringed upon. This should NOT be an investment vehicle for the rich and powerful only, but for
Thank you for the opportunity to comment.
I am an informed investor. I have a plan in place to be able to maximize retirement moneys. I have used a leveraged fund for several years (TQQQ).
The nature of TQQQ is volatile. I clearly understand the volatile nature. I depend on the volatile nature of this fund as if gives best opportunity for growth.
I oppose the proposed regulation. In this
To Whom,
I am of moderate net worth (under $3M). I am retired and have been trading for decades. I started using leveraged ETFs long ago, and the ample warnings made me research the issues. I did, and I traded accordingly. Yes, risks are higher, but so too are the rewards, and the warnings that explain the risk that come along with these products are what is needed.
The proposed regulations are
