Displaying 2161 - 2170 of 7635 Results
Dear FINRA,
Public investments should be available to all of the public NOT just the PRIVILEDGED.I should be able to choose the public investments that are right for me.
I am very capable of understanding investments and the risk. I shouldn't have to go through any special process of test taking before investing in leveraged and inverse funds. I have done my own research and am very
I am extremely upset with this proposed rule as I want the ability to choose what public investments are right for me and my family, and not some bureaucratic regulator that knows nothing about me or my situation. I should not be forced to go through a bunch of ridiculous hoops and processes to be able to decide how I should invest my money. I am well aware of the risks of leveraged and inverse
I should be able to choose the public investments that are right for me and my family. Public investments should be available to all of the public, not just the privileged. I shouldn't have to go through any special process like passing a test before investing in public securities such as leveraged and inverse funds. Having used these funds in the past, I am capable of understanding
It makes no sense to me for regulators to restrict access to leveraged and inverse funds to accredited investors. I am an accredited investor for many purposes but earlier in my investing career, I was well aware of the risks of leverage but because such funds were rare, I was unable to access them without incurring substantial margin debt. Similarly, investors need access to inverse funds when
Dear FINRA,
Public investments should be available to all of the public NOT just the PRIVILEDGED. I should be able to choose the public investments that are right for me.
I am very capable of understanding investments and the risk. I shouldn't have to go through any special process of test taking before investing in leveraged and inverse funds. I have done my own research and are very
(1) The leveraged and inverse funds offered by financial institutes provide excellent investment opportunities and give us financial security. Surely, the investors should aware of their risk and reward. Just like any investment that no investment can guaranty their future performance. However, the regulation should not limit the high potential to have the maximum return. (2) Talking about the
I have invested and traded stocks, options, etf's for 20 years and understand the risks involved. I have a high net worth and only risk approximately 5% of my stock portfolio on options and etf's hedges. I have extensive knowledge by reading about various types of investments. This is the U.S. where we should have the right to invest public investments of all kinds if we choose
I'm an individual investor who trades leveraged products and options on an almost daily basis. Leveraged products and options have become the cornerstone of my investment strategy and provide the income stream I need to live on in my retirement. I've spent over 12 years as an active investor and have put the time and effort into learning how such products work using all the
I work at an ocio and have the cfa. So coming from that background LETFs are not something that one stumbles into. There is enough info on the web that details the advantages and risks. Reddit LETFs, boggleheads forum, and portfolio visualizer have enough discussion of risks and advantages of these products. There is a lot of interest in these products from retail following the HFEA strategy upro
Estute Regulators,
Existing controls for access and use of higher performance/risk instruments are designed to and do adequately protect the investor.
Through the brokerage/firm, the investor is required to review and agree to very clearly stated statements as to the risk that leveraged (or otherwise higher risk) instruments carry. Responsibility for the outome of poor investment decisions lies