Displaying 2241 - 2250 of 7633 Results
For many years I have been investing in leveraged and inverse funds for many years. Throughout this time I have never considered such funds to be "the way to easy money". I have been cognizant of the risks involved and have been properly informed by my broker (Fidelity Investments) regarding the special characteristics of leveraged and inverse investing. I have never received
Investors take risks of all types based on their own assessments. Regulators have no business deciding how this assessment should be carried out since it's a personal decision. Only the investor can make this decision based on their own knowledge and wisdom of market behavior and how each investment tool functions. This is another step to limiting investment options for the little guy
Comments: L & I funds are no more risky than playing Options. If anything you should be limiting individual investors availability in using leverage to play options, or options trading in general, which can hurt the market as well. Options trading is far more like gambling and less like investing than anything else, had gained popularity with the newer more uneducated investing crowd and
I should have the right to be able to choose investments that are right for me and my family - not regulators. Public investments are called PUBLIC for a reason - they should be available to the public not a select privileged group that gets to profit while others miss their chance. I am capable of understanding leveraged funds and their risks and it is my money I am taking the risk with not
I'm writing to tell you that I do NOT want any restrictions placed on my ability to trade leveraged funds such as the TQQQs and SQQQs. I'm a young investor who has had great success using the volatility on these funds to grow my accounts. I've been able to pursue my dream of working as a professional musician due to the benefits of my trading income. I've been
Leveraged and inverse funds play a critical and essential role in my investments, particularly in times like today where the risk of a recession requires the tools to hedge my portfolio. With both bond and equity investments declining in value, as a super senior citizen I can't afford to have my portfolio gutted by inflation and bad economic management by my government.
Unlike large
Comments: As a retail investor that wants to take advantage of leverage without the use of options these instruments work to add exposure for a long or as a hedge on sector/market downturns.
I would say that most retail need to understand how they work in reality (rebalancing every day) and the risks associated during times of high volatility. In that case it's the same issues as having
I AM CURRENTLY AN OPTION BUYER AND SELLER AND SUPPORT THE REQUIREMENT OF EITHER TAKING A TEST TO ASSESS THE KNOWLEDGE THE INVESTOR HAS/HAS NOT ACQUIRED OR POSSESSES ON THE VARIOUS STRATEGIES IN OPTIONS TRADING TO ENSURE THE INVESTOR HAS THE KNOWLEDGE NEEDED TO HANDLE THE CONSEQUENCES AND RESPONSIBLITITIES ADEQUATELY. SHOULD THEY FAIL SUCH AN EXAM-OR PREFER TO TAKE A COURSE ON THESE ISSUES
I am writing to express my opposition to regulations being considered by the Financial Industry Regulatory Authority (FINRA), that may prevent me from being able to buy leveraged and inverse funds and other popular investments that may be deemed to be too complex for the average investor. I, as an individual, should have the ability to choose what investments are right for me. Public
I would like to comment on the rule to limit access for retail investors to "complex" instruments. As an infrequent trader, I understand the risk involved in investing. Those were clearly explained by online brokers I use and reinforced by all the research I've done and many years of trading I have. That said, leveraged and inverse funds are important tools that help hedge risks