Displaying 2281 - 2290 of 7640 Results
I want to thank you for your time and your commitment to helping me and my loved ones succeed in life. This is to address any concerns you may have towards leveraged and inverse funds. These are very important investment vehicles that my family and I have used over the years to help offer protection and provide investment strategies.
I believe that I should be able to choose the public
I disagree with the proposal to restrict access to leveraged or inverse funds for several reasons:
1. It is not the government's responsibility to tell me what I am capable of investing in. It is my money, my risk.
2. It is my responsibility to determine if an investment is right for me, and to understand benefits and risks.
3. it is not the government's role to assess or
I'm opposed to FINRAs proposed limits that may restrict access to L&I Funds or to disqualify individuals from trading L&I Funds or other complex products. Limiting access to investors should never be the answer. Education of the risks should be, which is what my financial institutions have provided. As an investor I understand that a leveraged ETF has increased
I want the right to invest in Bitcoin. Be it an ETF, Digecoin, or any type of digital currency. Public has allowed me to invest on my terms. I understand the risk involved with buying any stock be it cryptocurrency, blue chip, mutual fund, or bond. Putting restrictions on my account is another layer of beurucacy. If I had wanted to spend hours on paperwork and federal and state forms, I would
I am an adult who should not be treated as a child. I should have the sole right to decide what investments I take part in and not regulators. I have started trading from scratch and educated myself very easily from the resources available to from my broker. I fully understand the risks I am taking and should have the right to take them without regulator permission or requirements. The PDT rule
Hi,
I'm adding my comment in vehement opposition to the proposed new regulations limiting my ability to invest in leveraged and inverse funds. I oppose the proposed regulations because I want to exercise my own free will. I understand the risks and workings of both leveraged and inverse funds and do not want to have my ability to invest in these taken away from me, nor do I want to
I can understand the goal of protecting novice investors from complex investment tools they lack the sophistication to understand; however, requiring vendors to supply documents to educate the investment community and requiring users to sign off on having reviewed those documents should be the limit of any requirements. Restricting access based upon net worth is absurd.
In addition many
I oppose limitations on leveraged an inverse products.
These products are an important part of my portfolio and are useful tools for securing my long-term financial security.
Furthermore, these don't represent an outsized risk compared to idiosyncratic risk associated with investing in (or short-sellijg) individual stocks -- yet they already carry an *abundantly clear* warning --
I do not need any regulatory measures imposed on me when Im investing. I can understand the risks of a certain investment. If i do not understand the risks then I wouldnt invest. You may want to limit false advertising/marketing of funds -if there are any- but limiting investors- or just letting a certain group of investors be able to invest on certain securities freely should not be the
Comments: I believe that the foundation of a free market is the ability to choose the financial decisions that we as people make. While I understand that regulation is necessary to create a safe market environment with lower risk and less chance of inexperienced losses, there could be no possible way in which new regulations would be fair to all types of investors. A small percentage of investors