Skip to main content

Kathy Price Comment On Regulatory Notice 22-08

To whom it may concern,
Please allow me and my husband to continue buying and selling leveraged/inversed funds. Our social Security benefits are not enough to continue our lifestyle that we are accustomed to. It may not even cover our bills. We make hundreds/thousands of dollars monthly with the ProShares and Direxion Shares by selling/writing covered calls on them.
Thank you, FRED & KATHY

Chuck Kwiatkowski Comment On Regulatory Notice 22-08

Leveraged and inverse funds are an important of investing for everyday Americans as well as for the privileged. On this May 5th sell off day...a tv talking blamed leveraged funds in part, but the day before had a very large gain and no credit was given to them at all. And if they do cancel these instruments will retail still get blamed for the sell off? Yes...that is what they call us. What we need is a rule that blocks brokers from trading against their customers. This should be a no brainer. It is bad enough that our orders are front run by h.s. machines.

Michael LaVette Comment On Regulatory Notice 22-08

I think this is a very bad idea. Restricting the every day investor's access to inverse funds is yet another way to keep him/ her from protecting a portfolio from any harmful or destructive actions committed by government and Wall Street actors. It would be yet another regulation that is blatantly rigging the game against the little guy. In a free country, people are supposed to be able to make their own investment choices, which they believe would be best for them and their family. There should not be a net worth threshold to qualify for this right to invest as you choose.