Prakash Patel Comment On Regulatory Notice 22-08
I have every right to where i invest my hard earned wherever i choose , i don't like restrictions on what i can put money into . This is basically rich getting richer tactics .
For the Public
FINRA Data provides non-commercial use of data, specifically the ability to save data views and create and manage a Bond Watchlist.
For Industry Professionals
Registered representatives can fulfill Continuing Education requirements, view their industry CRD record and perform other compliance tasks.
For Member Firms
Firm compliance professionals can access filings and requests, run reports and submit support tickets.
I have every right to where i invest my hard earned wherever i choose , i don't like restrictions on what i can put money into . This is basically rich getting richer tactics .
It is unlawful to restrict the general public from investing in leveraged or inverse funds. These funds, like most equities, carry risk of losing all principal and this is something all investors and traders are aware of with a simple acknowledgement on a disclosure. We should not have to demonstrate additional minimum qualifications to invest in these vehicles nor should they be restricted to institutional investors. I have been using these funds for nearly a decade and should have the right to continue that without meeting new requirements.
Do NOT limit my investment vehicles or decisions. My money. My choice. Simple.
Regarding Regulatory Notice 22-08, I am submitting my comments opposed to this proposed regulation. Limiting access to inverse and leveraged ETFs is unnecessary and only reinforces public opinion that the 'system is rigged' against the retail investor.
I am very upset to learn of the proposed restrictions and limitations regarding leveraged investment products like etfs. I am a big fan of them and use them regularly. Please keep in mind that also provide safety in that only using 1/3 of my cash to purchase a 3xs leveraged etf allows me to hold 2/3 of my portfolio in cash making my portfolio move liquid than if I had 100% of my cash invested. PLEASE DON'T STICK YOUR NOSE INTO THIS NON-PROBLEM! Thank you. Ed Devine
I oppose restrictions on my right to invest in public investments.
I, not regulators should be able to choose the public investments that are right for me and your family. Public investments should be available to all of the public, not just the privileged.
I should nit have to go through any restrictive process such as passing a test before I can invest in public securities. And I am certainly capable of understanding leveraged and inverse funds and their risks.
Dear sir/madam ! I oppose restrictions on my right to invest in public investments. I'm capable of understanding leveraged and inverse funds and their risks. I don't need these measures imposed on me. Leveraged and inverse funds are important to my investment strategies. I use them as a limited part of my overall portfolio. They help me protect my investment.
We need the freedom to buy leveraged ETFs. Education should be additional not mandatory, people will learn more with practices.
To whom it may concern,
I oppose restrictions to my right to invest.
Public investments should be available to all of us, not just the privileged. I should be able to choose the public investments that are right for me and my family. I should not have to pass a test before I can invest in public securities like leverage and inverse funds. I am capable of understanding them and the risks and rewards in investing in these securities.
It is the investors free right to invest at risk. I oppose any restriction on freely investing.