Skip to main content

Roberto Moreno Comment On Regulatory Notice 22-08

I , not regulators , should be able to choose the public
investments that are right for me and my family.
Public investments should be available to all of the public, not just the privileged.
I shouldn't have to go through any special process ,
like passing a test, before I can invest in public securities, like leveraged and inverse funds. I'm capable of understanding leveraged and inverse funds and their risks. I do not need these measures imposed on me.
Leveraged and inverse funds are important to my

Michael Cox Comment On Regulatory Notice 22-08

I am against added restrictions to my ability to buy and sell complex products and options. As an adult, I am capable of understanding the risks involved and can judge for myself my desire for these types of products. It has never been easier to gather your own research as a retail investor than it is now, and I condemn further regulations that only attempt to fence off my ability to invest.

Daryl Mann Comment On Regulatory Notice 22-08

PLEASE...Do not punish educated investors by enacting the severe regulations which you are proposing in regards to inverse and leveraged ETFs. I have used these very successfully for many years. They compose an integral part of my investment strategy primarily as a volatility nuetralizer and as a hedge against downside risk. To date, I've successfully avoided punishing 2022 loses- primarily due to my use of these vehicles!

Dale Rice Comment On Regulatory Notice 22-08

The use of this these leveraged products has allowed my account to have excellent returns over the last many years from 2008 until now. I have only used the upside 2X leverage products and received very large returns, 1500% to 3500 % returns from 2008 through 12/31/2021. Yes there is high risk in these products unless they are used properly. So, what is proper use. If the products are only used when the markets or sectors are down 15-40% or more, the odds of the upside become much greater.