It poses a severe threat towards market fairness. It's like locking people in home because of Flu. Retail traders or investors should be able to freely choose whatever products that fit their trading strategies. Finance is NOT only for the rich or the privileged. We know what leveraged funds are. Also, the liquidity will be severely affected

Keep your nose off my cryptocurrency Garry Gensler

This is just to be able to make sure retail investors have even less power than they already have. Why would you want that? Without retail investors, the markets are dead. I am completely against this.

I feel I should be able to choose the public investments that are right for me and my family. Public investments should be available to all of the public, not just the privileged.

(a) Leveraged and inverse funds allow small retail investor like me to hedge/ protect against the massive swing we are having in the market due to the tremendous leverage available to hedge/ institutional funds
(b) We understand that there are fees/ costs and risks associated with these leverage and inverse funds, but it is better to have them, than not!

Retired experienced investors citizens, like myself, resort to investments in the market to complement their income. Government interference may negatively affect my ability to provide the means to protect and care for my family. Please, do not make our difficult life worse. Thank you.

The proposed regulation is ridiculous!!!
I am opposition to such extreme regulation on my ability to purchase leveraged funds.
This is radical and unprecedented threat by regulators and could affect my right to buy dozens of popular public investments, including leveraged and inverse funds.

I Vote NO to this regulation on my rights to invest unhindered!!

Several Comments on FINRA Notice #22-08: 1) I understand exactly what inverse and leveraged funds are and do not wish to be burdened by any type of special process that delays or restricts my ability to invest in such funds. 2) I can choose for myself what investments are right for me and do not want any regulations that would restrict my choice to do so in any way while potentially letting others invest in such securities. It's a matter of fairness to all market participants.

What I do with my money is my choice. It is an overreach to tell me what I can and can't invest in.

Please do NOT restrict investing in leveraged funds.

If restrictions are put in place and I am forced to sell a stock at a loss, that loss will be replaced by those that vote for it.

Do not push this bill through unless you have millions of dollars to pay back your constituents if there are any losses that occurred from forcing them to sell their shares.

I oppose restrictions to my right to invest in TQQQ, SQQQ and other leveraged products. I have been investing in these products for years and they are no more risky that any other stocks in the market. Anybody trading in the market has to understand that there is risk involved and chooses to take that risk...regulators should not try to babysit investors by trying to tell them which stock or fund they should or should not invest in.