Skip to main content

Joseph Williams Comment On Regulatory Notice 22-08

I, not regulators, should be able to choose the public investments that are right for me and my family. Public investments should be available to all of the public, not just the privileged.

I shouldn't have to go through any special process like passing a test before you can invest in public securities, like leveraged and inverse funds. I am capable of understanding leveraged and inverse funds and their risks. I do not need these measures imposed upon me.

Martin Moseley Comment On Regulatory Notice 22-08

We need to be able to participate in these kinds of investments in order to catch up what we've lost and manage our futures. I appreciate your attempts to help, but we need to be able to choose our own investments, take our own risks, learn from our mistakes, and benefit from our own risk-taking. I do not want you telling me what I can or cannot do, and I do not appreciate you feeling like you have to protect me from myself. I'm a well-educated, smart, courageous individual and do not need your help in this area.

Ziggy Liu Comment On Regulatory Notice 22-08

we should be able to choose the public investments that are right for us and our family. Public investments should be available to all of the public, not just the privileged. We shouldn't have to go through any special process like passing a test before we can invest in public securities, like leveraged and inverse funds. We are capable of understanding leveraged and inverse funds and their risks Leveraged and inverse funds are important to our investment strategies.

Marvin Rainwater Comment On Regulatory Notice 22-08

I am a very middle class investor, taxed to the max. I invest through a broker. My feeling is FINRA decisions always support the Wall Street, gang ! My feelings are stocks and regulators are extremely difficult for folks like me to I understand, thus my broker. To be Wall Street has been one a gang of thieves thrive by on us. A [REDACTED] recommendation to co trimly forget investments, even more, is a perfect example of how the gang seeks to manipulate the middle class.

Jacob Gall Comment On Regulatory Notice 22-08

I believe that investors should have the ability to invest in the securities of their choosing. While some are more complex and volatile than others, investors are consenting adults who are aware they must live with their consequences.

I believe that signing a document that acknowledges such extra risk is acceptable, as it makes investors aware of such volatility.

However applying safeguards such as net worth, requirement of specialized investment knowledge, or periods where investment isn't possible will prevent scores of people from building wealth effectively.

Richard Fedak Comment On Regulatory Notice 22-08

I vehemently oppose this proposed regulation. It is my RIGHT to choose which investments are appropriate for me. Regulators are not elected by ME to make choices for me. As a person with a degree in Finance and work experience with a Wall St. bank, I should not be required to pass any test that a bureaucratic regulator writes. Members of the public who use their funds in such investments are not as ignorant or as misinformed as you may believe. How dare you even consider that someone with a high net worth is by default more savy with investments than anyone else.

Rena Shamie Comment On Regulatory Notice 22-08

I am capable of understanding leveraged and inverse funds
and their risks. I do not need these measures imposed on me.
I should be able to choose the public investments that are right for me. Public investments should be available to all of the public, not just the privileged. Leveraged and inverse funds are important to my investment strategies. Leverage and inverse funds, including that they help me protect (hedge) your investments or seek enhanced returns, I use
them as a limited part of my overall portfolio.