Skip to main content

Leslie Corcoran Comment On Regulatory Notice 22-08

Hello People: I am disturbed that you are wanting to strictly regulate many types of public investments, and, in my case, inverse funds, to name one. I am a 73 year-old single woman, and I have been investing my IRAs and brokerage accounts for decades. It is unnecessary for me to submit to testing or training, as I understand the securities I invest in. I have invested in an inverse fund only a few times throughout the years, with a very conservative amount of money. The fund would be a small percentage of the portfolio. Please let sleeping dogs lie! Thanks.

Chad Matthews Comment On Regulatory Notice 22-08

The freedom to invest in a variety of financial products is paramount for those choosing this as a profession. Diverse investing is how many people make a living.

As with any form of employment, some excel and others find through experience they prefer other options. Not having choice would be disruptive to many livelihoods.

Like other jobs people get better through practice and pay taxes on earnings. For those that have put in the time to learn how to use complex financial instruments as a means of income, to limit or eliminate this option is wrong.

John Haskell Comment On Regulatory Notice 22-08

Please do not restrict the rights of investors to invests in the securities of their choice.
As an investor, I use inverse and leveraged funds as a portion of my total investing activities to hedge risk against adverse market moves and to improve my overall investment returns. These securities are a financial tool for me and provide liquidity for broader markets in up and down markets.