Skip to main content

Ampai Siripipat Comment On Regulatory Notice 22-08

I OPPOSE RESTRICTIONS TO MY RIGHT TO INVEST Leveraged and inverse funds are important to my investment strategies. They help me hedge my investments and enhance my returns, and I use them as a limited part of my overall portfolio. I have been investing for more than 10 years. With the experience plus my education - a PhD from a university in the U.S., I am capable of understanding leveraged and inverse funds and their risks. I should be able to choose the public investments that are right for me and my family.

Robert Gribnau Comment On Regulatory Notice 22-08

To whom it may concern. As a private investor, I should have the ability to choose investments that are right for me, and my family.... not the regulator!

Going through special processes such as a test BEFORE I can invest in public security such as leveraged and inverse funds, is limiting my freedom as an American citizen.

Leveraged and inverse funds are important investment strategies for me and have enabled us to complement out portfolio during both bear and bull markets.

Mark Canfield Comment On Regulatory Notice 22-08

If people are too stupid too understand what they are investing in that is their problem, not the employees of the U.S. tax payers. Regulation should be used only in instances where predatory practices are taking place and can be proven in court. Regulation should not be used because stupid people lost money in risky investments. If you mitigate the risk in this area those stupid people will simply put their money in other high risk schemes that will burn them. Will that mean that you have to then regulate that arena as well? Where does it end?