Skip to main content

Thomas Noriega Comment On Regulatory Notice 22-08

As an investor, I should not be limited in my right to purchase levered or inverse ETFs. These instruments can allow me to generate outsized returns under certain market environments and are a complementary hedging strategy. We live in a world where the dispersion of returns between ultra high net worth individuals and retail investors continues to get larger. Taking away a powerful tool from retail investors' toolkits is a step back with regard to improving the regulatory landscape.

Jeff Sullivan Comment On Regulatory Notice 22-08

Plain and simple, legislation that assumes 'average' people don't have the ability or intellect to invest their money wisely is condescending and patronizing and just bad policy. I can buy stocks, invest in 401Ks, etc. without having to do anything being proposed for crypto investments. Just because you don't understand it or fear it doesn't mean you need to regulate it for everyone else.

Jack Harmon Comment On Regulatory Notice 22-08

I have actively been investing nearly 30 years and during that time have seen the introduction of ETF's and inverse funds which were at that time put under intense pressure to disallow such funds. They have since proved to be very popular and effective tools in the personal investment world.

I believe that any restrictions placed on these funds is strictly an attempt to inhibit my ability to safely and efficiently control my own investment goals.

Marilynn Baldwin Comment On Regulatory Notice 22-08

I should be able to choose the public investments that are right for me. Public investments should be available to all of the public, not just the privileged.
I also should not have to take a test or go through ay other special process as I have a very good financial advisor who makes sure I understand my investments and any risks involved. I don't need these measures imposed on me.
I earned the money and have a right to invest as I see fit.