Skip to main content

John Crawford Comment On Regulatory Notice 22-08

I am writing to you regarding the government overreach that is FINRA #22-08. As an investor I expect that I should be able to make public investments without interference from the government. I understand it is my responsibility to educate myself on prospective investments and I don't expect to have to jump through government imposed hoops in order to do so. I urge you to not move forward with this rule. Regards, Jack

Daniel Bobrow Comment On Regulatory Notice 22-08

I actually agree with the proposal as I understand it. If the .com meltdown and especially '08 meltdowns have taught us anything, it's that it is not a level playing field when it comes to knowledge of financial markets and people need to be, if not protected from themselves, then at least given a 'reality check' concerning their suitability to be investing in highly leveraged and risky instruments.

James Messmer Comment On Regulatory Notice 22-08

The ability to freely access leveraged and inverse investment products allows even the small investor both opportunity and protection from market volatility. True, there are some who use these freedoms unwisely, but that is true of anything. Existing safeguards and regulations, in my opinion, are sufficient for the majority of investors, and risk and foolish choices will never be squeezed from investing. Risk assets are just that. Inverse products in particular serve as insurance for market gains during periods of increased volatility.