Skip to main content

Anthony Ficorilli Comment On Regulatory Notice 22-08

I'm just a lower-middle class investor. For the most part, the general public should be allowed to invest in inverse and leveraged funds as long as the companies providing them aren't out to scam the public with unreasonable and/or suspicious tricks. If there is something unusual about a fund, a brief-to-the-point and clear explanation, avoiding double-negative language, should be mandatory (egs. information about excessive costs/fees/commissions; other unusual risky characteristics about a fund).

Robert Crawford Comment On Regulatory Notice 22-08

I have the unalienable right to make the risk-reward analysis on investments for my account. I believe I am better qualified to choose investments that are best for me and my family. High net worth is the only measure of a citizens' ability to access the risks-reward balance of leveraged and inverse funds. One's education, business and life experiences are significantly more important than subjective third party regulator text book tests.