Skip to main content

Derek Martin Comment On Regulatory Notice 22-08

Regulators,
I utilize proshares solutions to help my own accounts, my family's accounts, and my clients accounts. It allows for cheaper ways to help hedge to take advantage of markets and I am well aware of the dangers since proshares prospectuses are so good! This is not a segment of the market we should be going after. Leveraged and inverse funds have provided us solutions to HELP people and make a difference in their lives. Me and my team and all my hundreds of clients urge you not to regulate, impede or restrict the use of these solutions

John Hull Comment On Regulatory Notice 22-08

I am extremely disappointed that limiting our investments in leverage/inverse products is even being considered. I have invested in these products for years. The idea of a bureaucratic determination of the complexity of an investment, of which these are not, seems to be overly vague, unconstitutional and violative of our civil rights. Please note my strong opposition to any proposal to limit our rights of investment opportunities in leveraged and inverse shares.

Robert Mccartney Comment On Regulatory Notice 22-08

We don't need more of the nanny state trying to protect us, especially as the federal government creates property and stock market bubbles with their insane federal reserve policies. Perhaps your time would be better spent worrying about the fact the govt is bankrupting the country instead of hand holding investors. Let the free market work. We already get plenty of notification of the potential for loss investing in these leveraged fund products - we don't need the rest of your hand holding..