Skip to main content

Mohsin Bajwa Comment On Regulatory Notice 22-08

I am writing to state that I should be able to choose the public investments that are right for me and my family. Public investments should be available to all of the public, not just the privileged. I shouldn't have to go through any special process like passing a test before I can invest in public securities, like leveraged and inverse funds. I am capable of understanding leveraged and inverse funds and their risks.

Richard Silverman Comment On Regulatory Notice 22-08

I purchased a leveraged and inverse fund to play the rise in interest rates. I looked at the alternatives, decided how much risk I was comfortable taking, and purchased a 2X fund which has done very well in a time of rising interest rates. While I may not be rich, I am educated and quite capable of making decisions. Banning these investments smacks of authority limiting my ability to make decisions. Let's not assume we are all dopes. My broker and ProShares warn me of the risks of leverage on a recurring basis. I'm a big boy.

David Nathanson Comment On Regulatory Notice 22-08

Against. Unreasonable to take away. The govt does not know my finances or abilities better than I do. I must be able to choose how I invest.

If there are new restrictions on buying or selling such investments, that could be terribly punitive to current holders. We already saw huge unfairness when investors were restricted from buying GME last year. Let's not see that sort of mess again.