Skip to main content

Jeffrey Cobb Comment On Regulatory Notice 22-08

I am an individual investor who has invested for several years in a variety of securities, mutual funds and ETF's, including leveraged and inverse funds. My brokerage firm already requires me to confirm that I have read various warnings about and understand the risks of these investment vehicles. I consider them a USEFUL and CONVENIENT investment tool in a whole toolbox of investment options.

Eun Park Comment On Regulatory Notice 22-08

I oppose restrictions to my right to invest. I should be able to choose the public investments, that are right for me and my family. Public investments suould be available to all of the public,not just the privileged. I shouldn't have to go through any special process like passing a test before I can invest in public securities, like leveraged and inverse funds.because I am well aware of the risks of leverage and inverse. so, I use 5~10% inverse and 10~25 leverage of my portfolio. Especially during a bear market like this year, Inverse is protecting my investment.

Madhava Venkatesh Comment On Regulatory Notice 22-08

Please do NOT restrict the use of leveraged ETFs in ANY way. Just this proposal is outrageous: You think only rich and privileged people understand risk? How condescending is that? Leveraged ETFs are the only way for middle class investors to have a decent shot of moving out of the middle class as we aim to become financially independent. Almost all retail investors understand the risk and volatility involved in these ETFs; we still want to invest in these leveraged products (especially leveraged bull market products) only because this is our only chance to become financially independent.