Bobby Sharp Comment On Regulatory Notice 22-08
The government should have no say in when and where I choose to make investments. This overreach in governing the people should be prevented.
For the Public
FINRA Data provides non-commercial use of data, specifically the ability to save data views and create and manage a Bond Watchlist.
For Industry Professionals
Registered representatives can fulfill Continuing Education requirements, view their industry CRD record and perform other compliance tasks.
For Member Firms
Firm compliance professionals can access filings and requests, run reports and submit support tickets.
The government should have no say in when and where I choose to make investments. This overreach in governing the people should be prevented.
I not regulators should be able to choose the public investments that are right for me and my family.
Public investments should be available to all of the public, not just the privileged.
I am capable of understanding leveraged and inverse funds and their risks. Regulators you do not need impose measures like passing a test to invest in these products imposed on me
Hello I would like to ask that you not block a path for the righteous to pursue a better life financially because I am one it struggles and lives paycheck-to-paycheck always trying to find a way that I may not suffer but also keep my head above water I'm not a troublemaker for a individual that causes harm to others I am a hopeful entity that my life would get better and things would become more prosperous I have always try to seek knowledge beyond the poor education that I have and the negative influences that my willpower will never let me give in to I no longer want to be a dreamer
To whom it may concern: I have an MBA in Fnanace - 1984, and have been investing for the past 40 years. Your proposal to start testing investors before allowing to invest in whatever you deem risky is arbitrary, vicious ans smaks of communism! I do not need your [REDACTED] to tell me what to invest in!!!!! Leveraged and / or inverse funds are no more risky than non-inverse funds! They are definitely less risky than options on Facebook, tesla, or any other security trading on nasdaq!
I strongly object to regulations restricting my ability to invest in leveraged and inverse funds without jumping through hoops. My investment risks are my own to take. Unless the government or its agency would like to guarantee me a fixed return on my investments that is acceptable to me, it is wrong to constrain my options.
I'm curious. Since it is my understanding that you intend to limit investing to those with ample funds to invest and what you deem to be a good understanding of the investment markets, to protect people from themselves, will you do the same for the online gambling industry? People have been known to lose fortunes there too, not to mention traditional casinos.
Let us invest as we like. Stop over regulating.
I oppose this restrictions on my right to invest in leveraged ETFs.
Sirs- increased standards for qualified investors is one thing, making the precess to invest as one onerous is another. The proposed rules are onerous and seek to discourage investments by smaller qualified investors. Thank you