Jeff Michels Comment On Regulatory Notice 22-08
Do not take my right to trade all investment tools. I count on inverse and leveraged ETF's as a part if my investing strategy.
For the Public
FINRA Data provides non-commercial use of data, specifically the ability to save data views and create and manage a Bond Watchlist.
For Industry Professionals
Registered representatives can fulfill Continuing Education requirements, view their industry CRD record and perform other compliance tasks.
For Member Firms
Firm compliance professionals can access filings and requests, run reports and submit support tickets.
Do not take my right to trade all investment tools. I count on inverse and leveraged ETF's as a part if my investing strategy.
This is America or use to be. Once I earn money and pay taxes on said money then who are you to tell me how to invest it? So playing the lotto is ok? Why is that ok but some investments are to complex for my small brain? Is it because the government sells the tickets? Please stop as your embarrassing yourselves. Please match wits with me. Who ever wrote this proposal should move to North Korea as your political views seem to mess well. From every freedom loving American "KISS OUR AMERICAN BUTTS!!!
ENOUGH GOVERNMENT INVESTIGATION, TO KEEP PEOPLE 'FROM' THEIR PURSUIT OF HAPPINESS. GIVE UP THE CONTROL ALREADY!
You not regulators should be able to choose the public investments that are right for you and your family. Public investments should be available to all of the public, not just the privileged.
We as investors need to be able to choose investents freely.No restrictions are warranted. We understand that regulators only need to enforce transparency and legality by the offering vendor.
Dear FINRA,
My comment is in response to FINRA Regulatory Notice #22-08. As an investor, I believe we should be able to decide and choose the public investment options that are right for me and my family. I am capable of understanding how the leveraged and inverse funds work without having to go through a special process to utilize them.
"Free market"
Not if you're not wealthy or smart enough, apparently.
I am opposing to this regulation. I understand and trade leverage and inverse etfs.
The SEC has no business limiting investors in any way. They already enforce their will through litigation, something completely arbitrary. The investor is at risk while investing, that's why it's investing and not guaranteed.
The SEC is an embarrassment and should be dismantled. Gatekeeping upward mobility under the guise of protection is absurd.
In order for a free market to work, the market must be "free". Limiting my options by barring me from inverse and leveraged funds does not really constitute a "free market". I do understand these investments and do utilize them in my portfolio. Please do not tell me that my portfolio is bad or "too complicated" for me.