This un levels the playing field so large wealth and insiders can get the largest reward on new and yet untested investment opportunities. To have wealth, is to always have an advantage for more wealth. This is unfair and difficult for minimally wealthy investors to have a similar chance at getting the best returns for getting in early. This effort is on the surface to keep small investors without sophistication from losing all their money. That is noble, and makes sense.

I oppose any restrictions to my right to invest as I see fit. Investments must remain available to all. The thought of imposing a screening process on individuals to limit investment access sounds like something you would hear in mainland China. I am well aware of the risks and limitations of leveraged and inverse funds as well as any investment I may choose. I do not want regulators oversight. I fully oppose regulation restrictions.

You have no right to tell me how to manage my monies. Do you like being told what to do with your monies? If so, then, send me all your money now! I oppose restrictions to my right to invest. Imposing restrictions is simply all about control and pure discrimination on the basis of a person's financial status. It's also, a process of elimination and a clear violation of our rights.

This rule is Ill advised as individuals must have the freedom to select their investments without cumbersome regulations.

I am an individual investor who believes a person should not need to go through a special process before being allowed to invest in public securities. To invest is to be aware that markets fluctuate and carry inherent risk -- any serious investor learns this quickly. I should not have to jump through hoops or demonstrate I have an arbitrary net worth before investing in leveraged or inverse funds.

Quit trying to take total control of our economy. We the people will NOT allow it & you will suffer more than us.

As an investor for over 60 years I find it to be questionable, at best, that actions such as those included in Notice #22-08 are being considered. People have the right to invest their money as they see fit. It is not the function of regulators to shelter investors from risk.

The common man or woman should have access and ability to make investments in any market they so choose.

I, as an investor should be able to decide where i invest my money so long as the investment is legal, without a regulatory authority deciding if Im competent enough, intelligent enough, and wealthy enough to invest in a certain investment. How hypocritical is it that i can take my entire savings to Vegas and put it on red or black at a roulette table without any oversight from a regulatory authority, but i wouldn't be able buy an ETF that is based on Bitcoin Futures? It really does smell rightlike protecting investors is not the primary concern in passing this proposed regulation.

I disagree completely with not allowing free cryptocurrencies exchange. I am voting for free cryptocurrencies exchange.